Agreement on the licenses #429

Open
Chris00 opened this Issue Mar 2, 2014 · 58 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
Member

Chris00 commented Mar 2, 2014

The license scheme for this site have been discussed on the infrastructure list and are summarized in LICENSE.md.

If you have contributed to this repository (i.e., if your name appears below), please add a comment to this issue saying that you agree that your contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md. If you do not agree, please say why.

  • Ashish Agarwal (repo)
  • Ionuț Arțăriși (repo)
  • Doug Bagley (ocaml-tutorial.org) — email?
  • Yotam Barnoy (repo)
  • Esther Baruk (repo)
  • Çagdas Bozman (repo)
  • Nicolas Braud-Santoni (repo)
  • Daniel Bünzli (cocan.org)
  • Nicolas Cannasse (ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • Benjamin Canou (repo)
  • Amir Chaudhry (repo)
  • Eric C. Cooper (ocaml-tutorial.org) — email?
  • Josh Davis (repo)
  • Emmanuel Delaborde (repo)
  • Richard Donkin (ocaml-tutorial.org) — email?
  • Jim Farrand (ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • Shayne Fletcher (repo)
  • Jacques Garrigue (repo & ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • Thomas Gazagnaire (repo)
  • Louis Gesbert (repo)
  • Stephen Gilmore (ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • Flavio Grossi (ocaml-tutorial.org) — email?
  • Damien Guichard (ocaml-tutorial.org) — email?
  • Steve Hiemstra (repo)
  • Brian Hurt (ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • Martin Jambon (repo)
  • Richard Jones (cocan.org & ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • Martin Keegan (repo)
  • Siraaj Khandkar (repo)
  • Neel Krishnaswami (ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • Michel Levy (ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • Christos KK Loverdos (repo)
  • Sven Luther (ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • Marek Kubica (repo)
  • Fabrice Le Fessant (repo & ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • Sylvain Le Gall (repo)
  • Ronan Le Hy (repo)
  • Anil Madhavapeddy (repo)
  • John Gerard Malecki (ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • Luc Maranget (ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • John Martin (repo)
  • Erick Matsen (repo)
  • Michel Mauny (repo)
  • Mike McClurg (repo)
  • Yaron Minsky (repo)
  • Jean-Francois Monin (ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • Florent Monnier (repo)
  • Markus Mottl (ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • Thomas Mraz (ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • Philipp Muller (repo)
  • Wolfgang Müller (ocaml-tutorial.org) — email?
  • Adrien Nader (repo)
  • Victor Nicollet (repo)
  • Lars Nilsson (ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • Tong Niu (repo)
  • Jose Manuel Nunes (ocaml-tutorial.org) — email?
  • Shawn Otis (repo)
  • Stefano Pacifico (repo)
  • Frédéric van der Plancke (ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • Quentin Pradet (repo)
  • Raphaël Proust (repo)
  • Tim Ruffles (repo)
  • Gabriel Scherer (repo)
  • Stanislav Sedov (repo) — email?
  • David Sheets (repo)
  • Paul Steckler (ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • Fabian Sturm (ocaml-tutorial.org) — email?
  • Roman Tereshin (repo)
  • Ryan Tarpine (ocaml-tutorial.org) — email?
  • Christophe Troestler (repo)
  • Rémi Vanicat (ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • Philippe Veber (repo)
  • Philippe Wang (repo)
  • Leo White (repo)
  • Yoriyuki Yamagata (ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • Jason Yosinski (repo)
  • Stefano Zacchiroli (ocaml-tutorial.org)
  • Éric Zhiqiang Ma (repo)
Member

dsheets commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Owner

avsm commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md

Member

agarwal commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Member

gasche commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

I think letting authors retain their rights for slides is the right choice, but it would also be nice if there was a reference license to use to avoid unnecessary variation and, in the general case, authorize free rediffusion of the material -- my freetard self would appreciate CC-BY-SA, but I suppose -ND may be a reasonable addition for a more consensual licence.

Contributor

jdmartin86 commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Member

amirmc commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md

Member

Chris00 commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Contributor

VictorNicollet commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Contributor

yminsky commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Contributor

mrnt0810 commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Contributor

pw374 commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Contributor

zma commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Contributor

mcclurmc commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Contributor

lehy commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Contributor

pquentin commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Contributor

Leonidas-from-XIV commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Contributor

ibnfirnas commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Contributor

raphael-proust commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

vanicat commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md

Contributor

dbuenzli commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Contributor

jdavis commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md

SGilmore commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Contributor

shayne-fletcher commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md

Chris00 added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 2, 2014

Complete mailcap & cocan contributors
Be sure all names appearing on #429
are also on the contributor page.
Contributor

mjambon commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

StefPac commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md

voila commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

lpw25 commented Mar 2, 2014

I agree that my contributions are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Member

eelsther commented Mar 3, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

ml1948 commented Mar 3, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

mauny commented Mar 3, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

  • Michel Mauny
Contributor

yosinski commented Mar 4, 2014

I agree that my contributions are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Member

Chris00 commented Mar 4, 2014

@ml1948 Could you identify yourself more clearly? Thanks.

Contributor

ShawnOtis commented Mar 4, 2014

I agree that my contributions are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Contributor

loverdos commented Mar 4, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

ml1948 commented Mar 4, 2014

On 04/03/2014 07:22, Christophe Troestler wrote:

@ml1948 https://github.com/ml1948 Could you identify yourself more
clearly? Thanks.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#429 (comment).

Yes, I was thinking that it was possible to find my email adress under
ml1948 (= michel levy born 1948).
I am michel.levy@imag.fr, previously MCF at university UJF grenoble, now
retired teacher.

Sincerely yours.

email : michel.levy@imag.fr
http://membres-liglab.imag.fr/michel.levy

Member

Chris00 commented Mar 4, 2014

On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 01:51:50 -0800, ml1948 wrote:

Yes, I was thinking that it was possible to find my email adress under
ml1948 (= michel levy born 1948).
I am michel.levy@imag.fr, previously MCF at university UJF grenoble, now
retired teacher.

Thanks. That is what I thought but I sent you an email for
confirmation to which you did not answer. I prefer to be sure that my
guesses are correct in this situation.

Member

agarwal commented Mar 8, 2014

In private email to me:

From: Jim Farrand jim.farrand@...
Date: Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 9:48 AM
To: Ashish Agarwal agarwal1975@...

Hi Ashish,

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md within the ocaml.org repo.

Kind regards,
Jim

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Member

samoht commented Mar 21, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md

Contributor

lefessan commented Mar 21, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md

Contributor

fccm commented Mar 25, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Contributor

OCamlPro-Bozman commented Mar 27, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md

Contributor

mk270 commented Mar 31, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md (and heartily endorse @cago 's use of the subjunctive; half you people are French anyway, surely!)

t8m commented Apr 1, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md. Tomas Mraz

Contributor

nbraud commented Apr 1, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.
Nicolas Braud-Santoni

Member

gildor478 commented Apr 1, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Contributor

pveber commented Apr 3, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md

Contributor

garrigue commented Jul 8, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Member

AltGr commented Jul 8, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Contributor

timruffles commented Jul 8, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository are licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Contributor

matsen commented Jul 8, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Contributor

phimuemue commented Jul 8, 2014

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in LICENSE.md.

Member

Chris00 commented Jul 8, 2014

On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 09:00:05 -0700, phimuemue wrote:

I agree that my contributions to this repository be licensed as detailed in
LICENSE.md.

Thanks Philipp.

Member

agarwal commented Jul 31, 2014


From: Adrien Nader adrien@notk.org
Date: Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:16 AM
Subject: [ocaml-infra] Statement of acceptance to the ocaml.org relicensing
To: infrastructure@lists.ocaml.org

Hi,

I hereby agree that my contributions to the ocaml.org website be
relicensed as detailled in the file
https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml.org/blob/8561943e67f9f789f86cd3bbc6049a6bbfc9fe4e/LICENSE.md

Some background: I contributed to the website but without going through
github myself and therefore couldn't agree through github (there would
be absolutely no link between the commits, the commiter and that
account); so here is my statement. If a stronger proof is wanted, I can
probably do it too.

Regards,
Adrien Nader


Infrastructure mailing list
Infrastructure@lists.ocaml.org
http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/infrastructure

Contributor

dbuenzli commented Mar 9, 2016

Shouldn't there be a last round to close this ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment