Track tasks and feature requests
Join 36 million developers who use GitHub issues to help identify, assign, and keep track of the features and bug fixes your projects need.
Sign up for free See pricing for teams and enterprisesBetter location format for reporting errors in ocamldoc #4518
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Comment author: lebedev I've started working and this and I'm not sure if warnings should have the same location information header? Any suggestions? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Comment author: lebedev This has been merged as #29. |
vicuna
added
ocamldoc
junior-job
labels
Mar 14, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This can be closed. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Thanks! |
vicuna
closed this
Mar 15, 2019
vicuna
added
the
feature-wish
label
Mar 19, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
vicuna commentedMar 6, 2008
Original bug ID: 4518
Reporter: @dbuenzli
Status: acknowledged (set by @damiendoligez on 2008-03-07T12:36:25Z)
Resolution: open
Priority: normal
Severity: feature
Category: ocamldoc
Tags: junior_job
Related to: #6069
Bug description
Related to #4515 the format used by ocamldoc to report errors does not allow to use emacs' next error to directly jump at the location. E.g. :
/Users/dbuenzli/devel/xmlm/src/xmlm.mli : Syntax error in text:
Same as {!input_tree} but reads a complete {{:#TYPEsignal}valid}
sequence of signals.
line 3, character 39:
{b Raises {!Error} on input errors.
should be something like :
File "src/xmlm.mli", line 3, character 39:
...
Thanks,
Daniel