Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 31 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.Sign up
constraint ignored on (existential) GADT #7261
Original bug ID: 7261
When defining a GADT,
is not equivalent to
I had expected both definitions to be equivalent.
Steps to reproduce
Compile the attached file foo.ml:
$ ocamlc -c foo.ml
=> Definition 1 is broken.
Then, in foo.ml, uncomment definition 2 instead of definition 1 :
$ ocamlc -c foo.ml
=> Definition 2 is ok.
Comment author: @nojb
Are you sure this is a bug ? The constraint is applied to the whole type definition, and it would seem that the existential type
type foo = Foo: 'b * 'b -> foo
does not have any type parameters so the constraint does not (rightly) have any effect.
Comment author: @lpw25
Constraints are on the whole type not a particular constructor. So the
Unfortunately, constraints are just equations between arbitrary types. There is nothing to check that they actually add any useful information. For example:
type t constraint 'a = 'b;;
It would be good to have a warning when neither side of the equation relates to anything useful, but it may be quite awkward to implement.
Comment author: lebotlan
type foo =
'b is implicitly quantified and its scope is implicit, as well as the scope of the type constraint. As a consequence, it is not immediately obvious that 'b is not bound in the constraint scope.
I understand that there is no quick fix.
This is unfortunate, because this pattern implies a GADT, which are already hard to understand. (The original example had two type parameters, and was used in a many-polymorphic function). At first, I thought that the ocaml type system was unable to typecheck what I was doing (I was not able to check the typing by hand). Fortunately, I was wrong.