Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Emphasise ocaml.org website and forum in readme #7647

Closed
vicuna opened this Issue Sep 29, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@vicuna
Copy link
Collaborator

vicuna commented Sep 29, 2017

Original bug ID: 7647
Reporter: @yawaramin
Assigned to: @gasche
Status: resolved (set by @gasche on 2017-10-08T16:01:09Z)
Resolution: fixed
Priority: normal
Severity: text
Fixed in version: 4.07.0+dev/beta2/rc1/rc2
Category: documentation

Bug description

The OCaml readme section 'Keeping in Touch with the Caml Community' mentions the ocaml.org website at the end of the section, and doesn't mention the discuss.ocaml.org forum at all. These two resources should be at the top of the section so users can immediately access them, and the older fora should be mentioned later.

@vicuna

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

vicuna commented Sep 29, 2017

Comment author: @yawaramin

In fact several places in the readme direct the user to caml.inria.fr, where they will immediately see that the site is being retired in favour of ocaml.org. It would be better to directly mention ocaml.org in the first place and avoid confusing users.

@vicuna

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

vicuna commented Sep 29, 2017

Comment author: @gasche

This sounds reasonable, would you be willing to provide a patch that rewords this section?

@vicuna

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

vicuna commented Sep 30, 2017

Comment author: @yawaramin

@gasche: gladly, I'll work up a PR and send it soon.

@vicuna

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

vicuna commented Oct 8, 2017

Comment author: @gasche

Fixed by the proposed PR (#1384, #1384 ).

@vicuna vicuna closed this Oct 8, 2017

@vicuna

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

vicuna commented Oct 8, 2017

Comment author: @gasche

(The final state is a compromise where caml-list remains mentioned first, and Discuss later.)

@vicuna vicuna added the bug label Mar 20, 2019

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.