Fix #8816 (Dynlink/packing issue in bytecode with 4.08) #8818
I was going to push a
@Octachron - given the report against 4.08.1+rc1, do you want this on 4.08?
@gasche - there's no section in
If you allow a very minor nitpick, "Fix #N" is not a very good name for a PR. When I have to find them again in the PR list, such titles make me unhappy. I edited this one and the other one (I just repeated/summarized the name of the bug they are fixing); let's avoid them in the future.