You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So that we can colorize them like most syntax highlighters do.
I thought about doing a PR myself but nothing evident showed up in a quick glance. Do the labels show up as structured information or you need to munge the type identifiers ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. The main purpose of this is to keep the issue tracker focused to what is actively being worked on, so that the amount and variety of open yet inactive issues does not overwhelm contributors.
An issue closed as stale is not rejected — further discussion is welcome in its closed state, and it can be resurrected at any time. odoc maintainers regularly check issues that were closed as stale in the past, to see if the time is right to reopen and work on them again. PRs addressing issues closed as stale are as welcome as PRs for open issues. They will be given the same review attention, and any other help.
So that we can colorize them like most syntax highlighters do.
I thought about doing a PR myself but nothing evident showed up in a quick glance. Do the labels show up as structured information or you need to munge the type identifiers ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: