[camlp5] New release 7.03, compatible with OCaml 4.06.0.

[ejgallego]

No description provided.

[camelus]

✅ All lint checks passed 506b5e5

• These packages passed lint tests: camlp5.7.03

---

✅ Installability check (7610 → 7611)

• new installable packages (1): camlp5.7.03

[ejgallego]

CI Failure with 4.06 looks due to the use of an old 4.06 image, but can't tell for sure.

[gasche]

@avsm the magic numbers used by the OCaml implementation were bumped after beta2 (not a great idea), and @ejgallego's intuition that the CI is using the older magic number sounds reasonable. Do you know when the images used for 4.06 testing were built? Are they fixed on beta2?

[ejgallego]

@avsm the magic numbers used by the OCaml implementation were bumped after beta2 (not a great idea),

Indeed @gasche , maybe a reasonable policy is that parsertree/magic interfaces are expected to stable once the first beta appears?

[gasche]

Well we sure made a mistake by not updating the magic numbers before the betas, but not updating them at all would have been even worse so that's how it is. I will do an extra beta or rc this week.

[ejgallego]

The CI says it is using the 4.06.0+trunk switch, but indeed I couldn't locate a git hash of the exact version used. I think that would be a useful data to have in the logs, where can I submit a feature request? On this repository?

[gasche]

Let's merge the release now to unblock Coq testing. If it turns out @ejgallego did a mistake we can always merge a new release and mark this one incompatible with 4.06.0.

[ejgallego]

Thanks @gasche , working fine in my opam setup.

[avsm]

I'm rebuilding the opam2 images again... hopefully this'll be the last magic number change :-)

…

On 25 Oct 2017, at 09:32, Gabriel Scherer ***@***.***> wrote: @avsm <https://github.com/avsm> the magic numbers used by the OCaml implementation were bumped after beta2 (not a great idea), and @ejgallego <https://github.com/ejgallego>'s intuition that the CI is using the older magic number sounds reasonable. Do you know when the images used for 4.06 testing were built? Are they fixed on beta2? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#10523 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADPrE0iogGS_GukNCyjXe87lu8LjjP8ks5svvImgaJpZM4QDAuv>.