repository authorisations #8494
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ No new or changed opam files 887a5f0✅ Installability check (6110 → 6110) |
|
hannesm: we need to work out a deployment/maintenance plan for both opam2 and conex before merging this into the stable repo. I'll close this for now as it's running the CI every time, but that's not because it won't get accepted eventually... |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
this add - in opam file format - authorisations for packages -- based on empirical analysis of the last 7000 PRs - see https://hannes.nqsb.io/Posts/Maintainers for details.
This is required for conex. This should not harm any old opam (famous last words).