New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pass UrlFile object to Provider.checkFileUrl instead of string #1732
Pass UrlFile object to Provider.checkFileUrl instead of string #1732
Conversation
|
| Name | Link |
|---|---|
| d87b2e4 |
|
@MantisClone is attempting to deploy a commit to the Ocean Protocol Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Hello, @kremalicious Thanks for taking a look at this and approving the CI checks to run. I believe the CI checks are failing because this PR depends on oceanprotocol/ocean.js#1627 which has not yet been merged/released. |
|
Hello @alexcos20 @kremalicious @mihaisc @bogdanfazakas This PR depends on oceanprotocol/ocean.js#1627, but other than that, I think it is ready for review. |
|
Misses one more usage of that file check, be sure to handle this for publish preview & published asset which is what the condition for market/src/components/Asset/AssetActions/index.tsx Lines 44 to 82 in 83d8344
|
|
ocean.js v2.3.0 has the changes required for this PR |
I looked at this briefly, but I don't know how to fix it. |
|
This needs merge or rebase against
ok, what did you try to solve this? What exactly is unclear? |
|
closing as abandoned, and #1765 is picking things up from here. |
Changes proposed in this PR:
UrlFileobject toProvider.checkFileUrlinstead of a stringDepends on oceanprotocol/ocean.js#1627
Reasoning:
This is an incremental step towards supporting other file storage types like Arweave, Filecoin, etc...