This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
Unicode variants of operators shouldn't be an 'implemenation option'? #383
Labels
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
The spec says:
Obviously certain things should be implementation-defined, but imo unicode operators don't make sense as such; implementation-defined only really makes sense for things that vary across platforms. Personally, I would remove them entirely, but either way they I think they should either be there, or not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: