Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cleanup: netx does not use netxlite legacy names #801

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 6, 2022
Merged

Conversation

bassosimone
Copy link
Contributor

@bassosimone bassosimone commented Jun 6, 2022

This diff refactors netx and netxlite to ensure we're not using
netxlite legacy names inside of netx.

To this end, we're cheating a bit. We're exposing a new factory to
get an unwrapped stdlib resolver rather than defining a legacy name
to export the private name of the same factory.

This is actually a fine place to stop, for now, the netx and
netxlite refactoring at ooni/probe#2121.

This diff refactors netx and netxlite to ensure we're not using
netxlite legacy names inside of netx.

To this end, we're cheating a bit. We're exposing a new factory to
get an unwrapped stdlib resolver rather than defining a legacy name
to export the private name of the same factory.

This is actually a fine place to stop, for now, the next and
netxlite refactoring at ooni/probe#2121.
@bassosimone bassosimone requested a review from hellais as a code owner June 6, 2022 12:37
@bassosimone bassosimone merged commit 2502a23 into master Jun 6, 2022
@bassosimone bassosimone deleted the issue/2121 branch June 6, 2022 12:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant