refactor(oohelper): use netxlite rather than netx #805
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The oohelper does not need to use netx and it's enough to use netxlite, hence let us apply this refactor. The original code used DoT but the explanatory comment said we were using DoT because of unclear issues inside GitHub actions. We are now using DoH and this is fine as well. The comment implied that any encrypted transport would do. See ooni/probe#2121
4 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The oohelper does not need to use netx and it's enough to use
netxlite, hence let us apply this refactor.
The original code used DoT but the explanatory comment said we were
using DoT because of unclear issues inside GitHub actions.
We are now using DoH and this is fine as well. The comment implied
that any encrypted transport would do.
See ooni/probe#2121