Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix Missing filter in issues#150 #151

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2022

Conversation

TYTaO
Copy link
Contributor

@TYTaO TYTaO commented Aug 30, 2022

Use hubHash to distinguish resources like other controllers

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and elgnay August 30, 2022 05:42
@@ -48,6 +50,9 @@ func NewAppliedManifestWorkFinalizeController(
return factory.New().
WithInformersQueueKeyFunc(func(obj runtime.Object) string {
accessor, _ := meta.Accessor(obj)
if !strings.HasPrefix(accessor.GetName(), hubHash) {
return ""
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we have a queueKeyFunc in helper that you can use. Also I think we should use WithFilteredInformersQueueKeyFunc

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the queueKeyFunc in helper this func?

func AppliedManifestworkQueueKeyFunc(hubhash string) factory.ObjectQueueKeyFunc {

This func will return a manifestwork key, but in this controller we need a appliedmanifestwork key. May I can provide another func in helper?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, that will be great. And maybe also a filter func in helper that can be reused by multiple controllers.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, that will be great. And maybe also a filter func in helper that can be reused by multiple controllers.

The changes have been committed

@qiujian16
Copy link
Member

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 1, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: qiujian16, TYTaO

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added approved and removed lgtm labels Sep 1, 2022
Signed-off-by: tytao <1522014784@qq.com>
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Sep 1, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Sep 1, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 6a0f69f into open-cluster-management-io:main Sep 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants