Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New optional/recommended fields - applicant, owner(s)? #80

Open
ejaxon opened this issue Oct 20, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@ejaxon
Copy link

commented Oct 20, 2016

Here at the City of Asheville, we're using this as a starting point for building not just the open dataset for permits, but our internal "canonical representation" as well. Obviously we'll have fields that fall outside the standard, but a couple that strike me as generally relevant are applicant (who may be a contractor or may be the owner) and owner(s).

Do these make sense as at least optional fields in the standard?

@mheadd

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Nov 25, 2016

@axtheset

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Dec 1, 2016

They definitively make sense as optional fields in the standard and should be considered for inclusion.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.