Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added us/ct/new-milford source #4641

Merged

Conversation

@MiniCodeMonkey
Copy link
Contributor

commented Oct 4, 2019

Statewide CT dataset had slightly incorrect locations for points on Duncan Ln, this local dataset has better data.

@trescube

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Oct 4, 2019

I think you'll need to prefix the file with HostedDownloadableData/

@openaddresses-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@MiniCodeMonkey

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented Oct 4, 2019

@trescube Hehe yeah, indeed! Just updated, thanks. Unfortunately this dataset only had parcels, but looks like things came out great

I just did an overlay between the statewide CT source and this one.

Red = Statewide Source
Blue = New Milford Source

Can confirm that the problematic addresses on Duncan Ln look spot on now.

Duncan Ln

This is good to merge in my end.

@trescube trescube merged commit 0dc5efd into openaddresses:master Oct 4, 2019
2 checks passed
2 checks passed
ci/circleci Your tests passed on CircleCI!
Details
openaddresses/hooked Succeeded on sources/us/ct/town_of_new_milford.json
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.