- +3 −3 usr.bin/ssh/PROTOCOL
- +3 −3 usr.bin/ssh/channels.h
- +9 −9 usr.bin/ssh/compat.c
- +3 −3 usr.bin/ssh/kex.c
- +6 −6 usr.bin/ssh/match.c
- +3 −3 usr.bin/ssh/match.h
- +2 −2 usr.bin/ssh/monitor.c
- +7 −7 usr.bin/ssh/mux.c
- +2 −2 usr.bin/ssh/packet.c
- +6 −6 usr.bin/ssh/readconf.c
- +11 −11 usr.bin/ssh/servconf.c
- +4 −4 usr.bin/ssh/servconf.h
- +10 −10 usr.bin/ssh/session.c
- +4 −4 usr.bin/ssh/ssh-agent.c
- +6 −6 usr.bin/ssh/ssh.c
There are no files selected for viewing
10 comments
on commit 5bde295
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Dare I say this is a little over the top, some of these terms have been in IT for decades. Should we also ban all spanish people from saying black?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yesterday's slave is today's client. I laughed based on the comarison between versions.
However nowaday's version fits better, on my humble opinion.
No slavery is allowed nowadays except if the person wants that specifically. So it is more correct to reflect that in the code as a newcomer reads it and will read it in the future. I support the new version, however it is needed to show to the person from which version it evolved, so this comparison is a perfect place to be seen if a person evolved from a decade-old books and documentation, where this was shown as old version.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it is important to distinguish the reason this change has been done for, was it done for modernization, or is it done due to a vocal minority complaining about political correctness. To me it seems like a change done out of "let's change something for the sake of changing something so we look progressive". While the naming might not make sense at first, this is standard naming that has been in use for decades and does not pose any ill-effect directly or indirectly in a way. Changing rule of thumb standards for the sake of changing something is not a good thing.
EDIT: A good analogy in my opinion for it would be renaming sidewalks to roadside non-vehicle transport lane because sidewalk might offend those who have to use a wheelchair
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Guys, listen to Alan Watts, especially about the game of black and white and how the western civilization tries to play white must win. This is getting out of hand and would end up bad. Check C.G. Jung for enantiodromia. And check with Taoists too!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think excluding the kind of person who gets offended by whitelist/blacklist and master/slave terminology is preferable to the endless purity spiral and 'cancelling' of persons for their privately held political opinions. The kinds of people who get offended by these terms are the same sort of people who will demand respectable productive contributors to be banned from participating for their privately held views. I don't develop for openbsd, and I've never used it and likely never will, but you should be aware that these seemingly small changes will eventually add up, and you may one day be the subject of wrath at the hands of the kinds of people who can not even handle innocuous terminology.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Guys, do you even know that this is just a git mirror? If you want to rant about this, go to the mailing lists.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Guys, listen to Alan Watts, especially about the game of black and white and how the western civilization tries to play white must win. This is getting out of hand and would end up bad. Check C.G. Jung for enantiodromia. And check with Taoists too!
Absolutely retarded, dropping names and books does not make a case for this tomfoolery, either come up with your own arguments or shut the fuck up, you "ex oriente lux" tard.
Author can't even get it right...