Annex cross-references require update #176
Closed
Milestone
Comments
@jyutzler it might be worthwhile to make these real asciidoc cross-references. That way they should stay up to date as long as you use stable anchor ids (i.e., not the autogenerated ones). I started the process of doing that (things like tables and figures are already done for instance), but never got round to the ATS. |
@pepijnve I hear you but it isn't a good use of my time to do all of these. My head hurts just trying to think of a convention to uniquely name each reference. (There are at least 100.) I may still do this, but literally if I have time to kill. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
There are numerous cross-referencing issues for Annexes, including the ATS and parts of the new Annex F content that still refer to old Annexes (e.g. Requirement 86).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: