inconsistent use of min/max is inclusive

[KRyden]

At revision 1.1, the mixed case MinIsInclusive and MaxIsInclusive were changed to all lower case- the document now contains two different column references for each:

minisinclusive/min_is_inclusive
maxisinclusive/max_is_inclusive

This needs to be corrected - all lower case is the change that was to be made.

[jyutzler]

@KRyden I am only seeing minisinclusive in the abstract tests. That is a pretty easy fix.
Do you see it anywhere else?

[KRyden]

That’s the only place I see it as well. Simple editorial fix should suffice.

Keith

From: Jeff Yutzler [mailto:notifications@github.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 9:41 AM
To: opengeospatial/geopackage geopackage@noreply.github.com
Cc: Keith Ryden kryden@esri.com; Mention mention@noreply.github.com
Subject: Re: [opengeospatial/geopackage] inconsistent use of min/max is inclusive (#260)

@KRydenhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_KRyden&d=DQMCaQ&c=n6-cguzQvX_tUIrZOS_4Og&r=tvLPjeMfOs5jYGz-2NsVow&m=6sip7lsmeQeP18iADu4IKQCufF0pGZD3XEzhevw-msc&s=8w9fBBOtOsLhYraSPz3w0RGLuSu42YY5aD_6swF25HY&e= I am only seeing minisinclusive in the abstract tests. That is a pretty easy fix.
Do you see it anywhere else?

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_opengeospatial_geopackage_issues_260-23issuecomment-2D254262469&d=DQMCaQ&c=n6-cguzQvX_tUIrZOS_4Og&r=tvLPjeMfOs5jYGz-2NsVow&m=6sip7lsmeQeP18iADu4IKQCufF0pGZD3XEzhevw-msc&s=NcESR9P9c-BpUxq6bGUNxwKt-qivyVi1VLrDNmrswgU&e=, or mute the threadhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_notifications_unsubscribe-2Dauth_ACCGBDjqnTu8gBjZ7IKna1QSOmpT108eks5q06U4gaJpZM4KYy5Y&d=DQMCaQ&c=n6-cguzQvX_tUIrZOS_4Og&r=tvLPjeMfOs5jYGz-2NsVow&m=6sip7lsmeQeP18iADu4IKQCufF0pGZD3XEzhevw-msc&s=JyEbuqEwkOX2fk9KErxl68L5KMwd_KD6zQGVpPE7r9k&e=.