BLOB Format tests are wrong #285
Closed
Milestone
Comments
Note there is some overlap with #288 here. The corrective action there applies here as well.
|
jyutzler
added a commit
to jyutzler/geopackage
that referenced
this issue
Feb 15, 2017
Merged
jyutzler
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 27, 2017
Approved by the SWG today. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
http://geopackage.org/spec/#_data_23
Test method 3.c.iv.
"gc.flags.envelope != 0 and envelope values are not NaN" is illogical. Maybe the original author got the logic backwards? But anyway, the envelope flag determines the presence/absence of envelope values and indicates the size. There is no obvious way to test whether the bytes in the envelope position constitute a valid envelope.This clause pertains to the SHALL statement at the very end of 2.1.3.1.1.I recommend dropping all of 3.c.iv. from the test.http://geopackage.org/spec/#_data_24
/opt/features/geometry_encoding/data/core_types_existing_sparse_data
/opt/features/geometry_encoding/data/core_types_all_types_test_data
This test is not appropriate for a data encoding standard. It is more of a test of a client capability. Recommend removing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: