New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What's up with Requirement 9? #309

jyutzler opened this Issue Mar 3, 2017 · 1 comment


None yet
1 participant

jyutzler commented Mar 3, 2017

If I'm reading this right, says:

SHALL NOT include any OMIT options from

That would mean checking individually for all 30 or so of these things and failing if any of them are present. This seems like a bad idea. What is the point? Can we nuke this requirement?

@jyutzler jyutzler added this to the 1.2-comment period milestone Mar 3, 2017


This comment has been minimized.


jyutzler commented Mar 7, 2017

In today's SWG we voted that this requirement is out of scope for the standard and that it should get a line-through. The ATS test will be removed.

@jyutzler jyutzler closed this Mar 7, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment