Credential request parameters for IETF SD-JWT VCs on this profile seem inconsistent with OID4VCI's

[millenc]

This profile requires credential requests to include a credential_definition object that MUST contain a vct claim with the credential type being requested, such as:

{
   "format": "vc+sd-jwt",
   "credential_definition": {
      "vct": "IdentityCredential"
   },
   "proof": {
      "proof_type": "jwt",
      "jwt":"eyJ0eXAiOiJvcGVuaWQ0dmNpLXByb29mK2p3dCIsImFsZyI6IkVTMjU2IiwiandrIjp7Imt0eSI6IkVDIiwiY3J2IjoiUC0yNTYiLCJ4IjoiblVXQW9BdjNYWml0aDhFN2kxOU9kYXhPTFlGT3dNLVoyRXVNMDJUaXJUNCIsInkiOiJIc2tIVThCalVpMVU5WHFpN1N3bWo4Z3dBS18weGtjRGpFV183MVNvc0VZIn19.eyJhdWQiOiJodHRwczovL2NyZWRlbnRpYWwtaXNzdWVyLmV4YW1wbGUuY29tIiwiaWF0IjoxNzAxOTYwNDQ0LCJub25jZSI6IkxhclJHU2JtVVBZdFJZTzZCUTR5bjgifQ.-a3EDsxClUB4O3LeDD5DVGEnNMT01FCQW4P6-2-BNBqc_Zxf0Qw4CWayLEpqkAomlkLb9zioZoipdP-jvh1WlA"
   }
}

However, the OID4VCI in its editor's draft requires requests for IETF SD-JWT VCs credentials to include the vct claim as a root property on the JSON object, such as:

{
   "format": "vc+sd-jwt",
   "vct": "SD_JWT_VC_example_in_OpenID4VCI",
   "proof": {
      "proof_type": "jwt",
      "jwt":"eyJ0eXAiOiJvcGVuaWQ0dmNpLXByb29mK2p3dCIsImFsZyI6IkVTMjU2IiwiandrIjp7Imt0eSI6IkVDIiwiY3J2IjoiUC0yNTYiLCJ4IjoiblVXQW9BdjNYWml0aDhFN2kxOU9kYXhPTFlGT3dNLVoyRXVNMDJUaXJUNCIsInkiOiJIc2tIVThCalVpMVU5WHFpN1N3bWo4Z3dBS18weGtjRGpFV183MVNvc0VZIn19.eyJhdWQiOiJodHRwczovL2NyZWRlbnRpYWwtaXNzdWVyLmV4YW1wbGUuY29tIiwiaWF0IjoxNzAxOTYwNDQ0LCJub25jZSI6IkxhclJHU2JtVVBZdFJZTzZCUTR5bjgifQ.-a3EDsxClUB4O3LeDD5DVGEnNMT01FCQW4P6-2-BNBqc_Zxf0Qw4CWayLEpqkAomlkLb9zioZoipdP-jvh1WlA"
   }
}

These are clearly incompatible. Which one should we adopt? Does this profile require an update on this regard?

[Sakurann]

OID4VCI is the source of truth. I will do a PR updating example in HAIP. thank you for the catch!

[millenc]

OID4VCI is the source of truth. I will do a PR updating example in HAIP. thank you for the catch!

Thanks @Sakurann!