Skip to content

Conversation

@bc-pi
Copy link
Member

@bc-pi bc-pi commented Jan 10, 2025

Copy link
Collaborator

@paulbastian paulbastian left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved with the outstanding suggestion

Copy link
Member

@c2bo c2bo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved if the re-wording of the MTI encryption algorithm section by Brian is accepted

Co-authored-by: Brian Campbell <71398439+bc-pi@users.noreply.github.com>
Comment on lines +233 to +235
* Response encryption MUST be performed as specified in [@!OIDF.OID4VP, section 7.3]. The JWE `alg` (algorithm) header parameter (see [@!RFC7516, section 4.1.1])
value `ECDH-ES` (as defined in [@!RFC7518, section 4.6]), with key agreement utilizing keys on the `P-256` curve (see [@!RFC7518, section 6.2.1.1]) MUST be supported.
The JWE `enc` (encryption algorithm) header parameter (see [@!RFC7516, section 4.1.2]) value `A128GCM` (as defined in [@!RFC7518, section 5.3]) MUST be supported.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Uppercase "Section"?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Sakurann Sakurann merged commit d328a95 into main Jan 17, 2025
2 checks passed
Sakurann pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2025
5 approvals. open for a week. executes WG agreement
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants