-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
Mandate AKI for trusted_authorities #223
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
d4a4388 to
b092c37
Compare
|
would approve if my suggestion would be applied
agree - suggest to open an issue? |
Co-authored-by: Kristina <52878547+Sakurann@users.noreply.github.com>
I did yesterday: #225. Oliver's PR also goes into the same direction |
awoie
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, just minor editorial suggestions
Co-authored-by: Oliver Terbu <oliver.terbu@mattr.global>
|
Kristina to rereview then consensus on WG to merge this. |
Closes #160
I think we should restructure some parts of haip into a separate section - e.g., move openid4vp & dcql requirements that are shared by sd-jwt vc, dc api, mdoc profiles into their own section. I would propose to do so in a new PR once the remaining ones that are awaiting reviews are merged?