Attempt to clarify which sections/flows are mandatory #278
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Also remove some 'unless otherwise specified' that seemed like they left the door open for people to define profiles of HAIP that could remove MUSTs. closes #193
charsleysa
approved these changes
Sep 25, 2025
javereec
reviewed
Sep 25, 2025
javereec
approved these changes
Sep 25, 2025
Contributor
javereec
left a comment
javereec
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested some minor editorial changes for consistency
Co-authored-by: Jan Vereecken <ciao@janvereecken.com>
babisRoutis
approved these changes
Oct 1, 2025
jogu
added
has-at-least-3-approvals
Sakurann
approved these changes
Oct 2, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Also remove some 'unless otherwise specified' that seemed like they left the door open for people to define profiles of HAIP that could remove MUSTs.
I didn't go as far as "if implementing OID4VP you must comply with section 4.4, 5, 6, 7 and 8" as that felt like:
I believe the sections that are optional in some cases already/now indicate that within them.
closes #193