Skip to content

Conversation

@Sakurann
Copy link
Contributor

resolves #191 + some clean up
is this what we wanted in this PR? I am a little surprised this must is not a requirement in the status list itself? (quickly checked but did not seem to be)

@Sakurann Sakurann added this to the 1.0 Final milestone Sep 24, 2025
Co-authored-by: Christian Bormann <chris.bormann@gmx.de>
@Sakurann
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sakurann commented Oct 2, 2025

wg discussion: merge once there are approvals

@Sakurann Sakurann merged commit ca1bd6c into main Oct 2, 2025
2 checks passed
jogu added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2025
The change to fix this was already applied in #279 but was reverted in #288 during git conflict resolution.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

unique identifier in each issued credential

5 participants