Skip to content

Conversation

@c2bo
Copy link
Member

@c2bo c2bo commented Sep 30, 2025

Proposal making the wallet attestations format recommended instead of mandatory. Happy to change the text if we get consensus on the wg for a different path, but this seemed to be the current outcome?

closes #211

Copy link
Contributor

@jogu jogu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There seems to be a git conflict in the normative changes unfortunately - would be good if you can resolve that too please.

Co-authored-by: Joseph Heenan <joseph@authlete.com>
@jogu jogu changed the title Wallet Attestation formats Allow other Wallet Attestation formats Oct 2, 2025
@c2bo c2bo force-pushed the 211-wallet-attestation-formats branch from 4c98820 to 6b3fed3 Compare October 3, 2025 12:32
Copy link
Collaborator

@awoie awoie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some editorial comments and the following two normative comments:

  • use "if applicable" when talking about PAR requirements
  • exclude trust anchor from x5c

Co-authored-by: Oliver Terbu <oliver.terbu@mattr.global>
Co-authored-by: Joseph Heenan <joseph@authlete.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@awoie awoie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

had one minor nit

Co-authored-by: Oliver Terbu <oliver.terbu@mattr.global>
@Sakurann Sakurann merged commit 967b423 into main Oct 7, 2025
2 checks passed
@Sakurann Sakurann added this to the 1.0 Final milestone Oct 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

allow use of other wallet attestations formats?

5 participants