Skip to content

Conversation

@jogu
Copy link
Contributor

@jogu jogu commented May 31, 2025

Daniel Fett pointed out that the current wording around the Best Current Practice for OAuth 2.0 Security document is misleading as VCI does not mention all the best current practices.

Reword to try and address this.

Add a recommendation to use FAPI2 as a way to comply with the BCP, and add some notes around where FAPI2 might not be applicable.

Also replace the references to RFC9700 with BCP240 as it is likely to be an evolving document.

closes #291

Daniel Fett pointed out that the current wording around the Best Current
Practice for OAuth 2.0 Security document is misleading as VCI does not
mention all the best current practices.

Reword to try and address this.

Add a recommendation to use FAPI2 as a way to comply with the BCP, and
add some notes around where FAPI2 might not be applicable.

Also replace the references to RFC9700 with BCP240 as it is likely to be
an evolving document.

closes #291
@jogu jogu requested a review from danielfett May 31, 2025 20:11
@jogu jogu added this to the Final 1.0 milestone Jun 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@tplooker tplooker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, good improvement to just reference the BCP here more generally.

Copy link
Collaborator

@Sakurann Sakurann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm.

just curious - it is best practice to reference as bcp240 and not as rfc9700 even if these are technically the same thing?

@jogu
Copy link
Contributor Author

jogu commented Jun 12, 2025

lgtm.

just curious - it is best practice to reference as bcp240 and not as rfc9700 even if these are technically the same thing?

Referencing rfc9700 kinda sets the expectation as "implement exactly what's in this RFC" whereas referencing BCP240 is a more explicit "follow OAuth security BCPs even if they're been updated since rfc9700".

@jogu jogu merged commit 706f6cb into main Jun 16, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve content of security recommendations

5 participants