Skip to content

Conversation

@jogu
Copy link
Contributor

@jogu jogu commented Jun 19, 2025

Make some items required when key bound credentials are in use, so the wallets knows if it has to supply proofs or not, and if so in what format.

closes #530

@jogu jogu requested a review from charsleysa June 19, 2025 08:57
@jogu jogu added this to the Final 1.0 milestone Jun 19, 2025
jogu added 2 commits June 19, 2025 10:36
Make some items required when key bound credentials are in use, so the
wallets knows if it has to supply proofs or not, and if so in what format.

closes #530
Make some items required when key bound credentials are in use, so the
wallets knows if it has to supply proofs or not, and if so in what format.

closes #530
@jogu jogu force-pushed the missing-metadata-meaning branch from f25a63b to edcadb9 Compare June 19, 2025 11:19
@jogu jogu requested a review from davidz25 June 19, 2025 11:20
Copy link
Collaborator

@Sakurann Sakurann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think some of the current wording is a bit awkward - made suggestions

Co-authored-by: Kristina <52878547+Sakurann@users.noreply.github.com>
@Sakurann Sakurann merged commit 5ca94d5 into main Jun 24, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Semantics of missing optional metadata fields is unclear

7 participants