Skip to content

Conversation

@Sakurann
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@Sakurann Sakurann added this to the Final 1.0 milestone Aug 12, 2025
@Sakurann Sakurann added the editorial Things that are not normative changes label Aug 12, 2025
Copy link
Member

@c2bo c2bo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure the change from Verifiable Credential to Credential helps if we only make that change here. We should either make that change in a lot more places or revert the change here imho

Copy link
Contributor

@paulbastian paulbastian left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would rather leave it here as is, making a note in the terminology what the equivalent term in OpenID4VP is and fix VP terminology in 1.1

Comment on lines 104 to 108
Claims-based Holder Binding:
: Ability of the Holder to prove legitimate possession of a Credential by proving certain claims, e.g., name and date of birth, for example by presenting another Credential. Claims-based Holder Binding allows long-term, cross-device use of a Credential as it does not depend on cryptographic key material stored on a certain device. One example of such a Credential could be a diploma.

Biometrics-based Binding:
: Ability of the Holder to prove legitimate possession of a Verifiable Credential by demonstrating a certain biometric trait, such as fingerprint or face. One example of a Verifiable Credential with Biometrics-based Holder Binding is a mobile driving license [@ISO.18013-5], which contains a portrait of the holder.
Biometrics-based Holder Binding:
: Ability of the Holder to prove legitimate possession of a Credential by demonstrating a certain biometric trait, such as a fingerprint or face. One example of a Credential with biometric Holder Binding is a mobile driving license [@ISO.18013-5], which contains a portrait of the Holder.
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

because openid4vp literally defines

Verifiable Credential (VC): An Issuer-signed Credential whose authenticity can be cryptographically verified.

i am not comfortable reverting these to verifiable credential

Sakurann and others added 2 commits August 26, 2025 19:33
Co-authored-by: Christian Bormann <chris.bormann@gmx.de>
@Sakurann Sakurann requested review from c2bo, jogu and paulbastian August 26, 2025 17:33
@Sakurann Sakurann requested a review from jogu August 26, 2025 18:45

Biometrics-based Binding:
: Ability of the Holder to prove legitimate possession of a Verifiable Credential by demonstrating a certain biometric trait, such as fingerprint or face. One example of a Verifiable Credential with Biometrics-based Holder Binding is a mobile driving license [@ISO.18013-5], which contains a portrait of the holder.
Biometrics-based Holder Binding:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This term isn't actually used in the specification so we could consider removing the definition?


Claims-based Binding:
: Ability of the Holder to prove legitimate possession of a Verifiable Credential by proofing certain claims, e.g., name and date of birth, for example, by presenting another Verifiable Credential. Claims-based Holder Binding allows long-term, cross-device use of a Credential as it does not depend on cryptographic key material stored on a certain device. One example of such a Verifiable Credential could be a Diploma.
Claims-based Holder Binding:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm okay with this change, but shouldn't we update the use of "Claims-based Binding" in the rest of the doc to say "Claims-based Holder Binding" too?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will do

@Sakurann Sakurann requested a review from jogu August 29, 2025 12:56
Co-authored-by: Christian Bormann <chris.bormann@gmx.de>
@jogu jogu merged commit 97cabfb into main Aug 29, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

editorial Things that are not normative changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants