Skip to content

Conversation

@MasterKale
Copy link
Contributor

This PR removes a mention of CBOR-encoding the bytes of a JWK thumbprint to bring the spec text in line with the non-normative example of how to compose OpenID4VPDCAPIHandoverInfo. As discussed in #591, the CDDL doesn't seem to mention that jwk_thumbprint is CBOR-encoded, so it's likely this simple removal of the word "CBOR" is enough to bring the spec text in line with the examples and CDDL definition.

Fixes #591.

MasterKale added a commit to MasterKale/SimpleDigiCreds that referenced this pull request May 8, 2025
It was an OID4VP spec text issue, see openid/OpenID4VP#592
@Sakurann Sakurann added this to the Final 1.0 milestone May 13, 2025
@MasterKale
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm working to get myself added to our Contribution Agreement, I apologize for the delay.

@Sakurann Sakurann merged commit 2879c75 into openid:main May 14, 2025
2 checks passed
@MasterKale MasterKale deleted the 591-clarify-session-transcript-jwk-thumbprint branch May 14, 2025 17:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

OpenID4VPDCAPIHandoverInfo sample code in Draft 28 may not be accurate to spec text

6 participants