Formal Analysis Results #46
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sakurann
requested review from
Sakurann,
gsasikumar and
tlodderstedt
and removed request for
Sakurann and
tlodderstedt
gsasikumar
requested changes
Dec 6, 2023
Collaborator
|
This is good to go from my end |
gsasikumar
approved these changes
Dec 7, 2023
Sakurann
approved these changes
Mar 1, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi all! I finally got around to writing down my findings of the formal security analysis. In this PR, I specify to fixes to the specification that make its security guarantees stronger. I also updated the security considerations.
You can find the results of my formal analysis here: https://github.com/felixlinker/tamarin_openid4vp_ble I tried to succinctly describe the outcome of my analysis :)