You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: openid-sharedsignals-framework-1_0.md
+2-2Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -244,10 +244,10 @@ Subject Principals are identified by Subject Members defined below.
244
244
# Subject Members in SSF Events {#subject-ids}
245
245
246
246
## Subject Members {#subject-members}
247
-
A Subject Member of a SSF event describes a subject of the event. A top-level claim named `sub_id` MUST be used to describe the primary Subject Principal of the event.
247
+
A Subject Member of a SSF event describes a subject of the event. A top-level claim named `sub_id` MUST be used to describe the primary subject of the event.
248
248
249
249
### Existing CAEP and RISC Events
250
-
Event types already defiend in the CAEP ({{CAEP}}) and RISC ({{RISC}}) drafts MAY use a `subject` field within the `events` claim of the SSF event to describe the primary Subject Principal of the event. SSF Transmitters SHOULD include the top-level `sub_id` claim even for these existing event types.
250
+
Event types already defined in the CAEP ({{CAEP}}) and RISC ({{RISC}}) specifications MAY use a `subject` field within the `events` claim of the SSF event to describe the primary Subject Principal of the event. SSF Transmitters SHOULD include the top-level `sub_id` claim even for these existing event types.
251
251
252
252
### New Event Types
253
253
New event types MUST use the top-level `sub_id` claim and MUST NOT use the `subject` field in the `events` claim to describe the primary Subject Principal.
0 commit comments