From 090bd3afc37555582bde61d03e2e32350ae5d714 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Daniel D. Daugherty" <dcubed@openjdk.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 15:30:33 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] 8259397: ThreadsSMRSupport::print_info_on() should use
 try_lock_without_rank_check()

Reviewed-by: coleenp, dholmes
---
 src/hotspot/share/runtime/threadSMR.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/hotspot/share/runtime/threadSMR.cpp b/src/hotspot/share/runtime/threadSMR.cpp
index d0c9dd0ef3240..a44a2cd6c18d3 100644
--- a/src/hotspot/share/runtime/threadSMR.cpp
+++ b/src/hotspot/share/runtime/threadSMR.cpp
@@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ void ThreadsSMRSupport::print_info_on(const Thread* thread, outputStream* st) {
 // Print Threads class SMR info.
 void ThreadsSMRSupport::print_info_on(outputStream* st) {
   bool needs_unlock = false;
-  if (Threads_lock->try_lock()) {
+  if (Threads_lock->try_lock_without_rank_check()) {
     // We were able to grab the Threads_lock which makes things safe for
     // this call, but if we are error reporting, then a nested error
     // could happen with the Threads_lock held.