Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8293019: [JVMCI] change ratio of libgraal to C1 threads and use one isolate per libgraal thread #10094

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

dougxc
Copy link
Member

@dougxc dougxc commented Aug 31, 2022

JDK-8242440 allows the VM to use one isolate per libgraal thread (OIPLT). This has a number of benefits such better isolation of compiler crashes and avoids GC interference between isolates. Experimentation has shown that reducing the ratio of libgraal threads to C1 threads also helps keep the max RSS down. This PR makes OIPLT the default and adds a JVMCINativeLibraryThreadFraction flag for configuring the libgraal to C1 thread ratio. The default value for JVMCINativeLibraryThreadFraction is 0.33 which means there are 2 C1 threads per libgraal thread.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8293019: [JVMCI] change ratio of libgraal to C1 threads and use one isolate per libgraal thread

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10094/head:pull/10094
$ git checkout pull/10094

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10094
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10094/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10094

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10094

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10094.diff

@dougxc dougxc marked this pull request as ready for review August 31, 2022 07:28
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 31, 2022

👋 Welcome back dnsimon! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 31, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 31, 2022

@dougxc The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Aug 31, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 31, 2022

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 31, 2022

@dougxc This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8293019: [JVMCI] change ratio of libgraal to C1 threads and use one isolate per libgraal thread

Reviewed-by: never, iveresov

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 5 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 0d51f63: 8293008: Replace uses of StringBuffer with StringBuilder in MergeCollation
  • 5d6779f: 8292681: Add JMH for ProtectionDomain
  • 38e6706: 8293050: RISC-V: Remove redundant non-null assertions about macro-assembler
  • 4c90e87: 8290781: Segfault at PhaseIdealLoop::clone_loop_handle_data_uses
  • 9e3176b: 8293035: Cleanup MacroAssembler::movoop code patching logic aarch64 riscv

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 31, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@veresov veresov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dougxc
Copy link
Member Author

dougxc commented Aug 31, 2022

Thanks for the reviews @veresov and @tkrodriguez .

@dougxc
Copy link
Member Author

dougxc commented Aug 31, 2022

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 31, 2022

Going to push as commit 3c1bda4.
Since your change was applied there have been 5 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 0d51f63: 8293008: Replace uses of StringBuffer with StringBuilder in MergeCollation
  • 5d6779f: 8292681: Add JMH for ProtectionDomain
  • 38e6706: 8293050: RISC-V: Remove redundant non-null assertions about macro-assembler
  • 4c90e87: 8290781: Segfault at PhaseIdealLoop::clone_loop_handle_data_uses
  • 9e3176b: 8293035: Cleanup MacroAssembler::movoop code patching logic aarch64 riscv

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 31, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 31, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 31, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 31, 2022

@dougxc Pushed as commit 3c1bda4.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@dougxc dougxc deleted the JDK-8293019 branch May 23, 2023 07:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants