-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8292969: Bad Thread Utilization in ForkJoinPool #10198
Conversation
👋 Welcome back dl! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
scan's @return needs to be changed to indicate it also now returns a packed int
Thanks. replaced with: |
|
Hello Doug, for the bots to trigger the review process, the title of this PR is expected to be |
Thanks. I keep forgetting the required format for these. |
w.topLevelExec(t, q); | ||
return src; | ||
return src + (prevSrc << SWIDTH); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are all of these values (src
, prevSrc
) less or equal 0x7FFF
? Otherwise we are playing with sign bits here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, see the discussions around line 391 of internal docs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, all right then.
@DougLea This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 232 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've been testing with this change for some time and it has worked well.
/integrate |
Going to push as commit bc12e95.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
8292969: This small change in signal propagation rules improves utilization when entry queues are resized,
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10198/head:pull/10198
$ git checkout pull/10198
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10198
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10198/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10198
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10198
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10198.diff