Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JDK-8293493: Signal Handlers printout should show signal block state #10199

Conversation

tstuefe
Copy link
Member

@tstuefe tstuefe commented Sep 7, 2022

I needed this recently. We print out the signal block mask, which is fine, but more interesting would be the existing block state at the point of the crash/assertion.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8293493: Signal Handlers printout should show signal block state

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10199/head:pull/10199
$ git checkout pull/10199

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10199
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10199/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10199

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10199

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10199.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 7, 2022

👋 Welcome back stuefe! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@tstuefe tstuefe changed the title JDK-8293493: Signal Handlers printout in hs-err file should tell which signals are blocked JDK-8293493: Signal Handlers printout should show signal block state Sep 7, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 7, 2022

@tstuefe The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org label Sep 7, 2022
@tstuefe tstuefe marked this pull request as ready for review September 7, 2022 16:57
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 7, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 7, 2022

Webrevs

@tstuefe
Copy link
Member Author

tstuefe commented Sep 14, 2022

Friendly ping. Change is really simple.

Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems okay though may be of limited use if the crash is from a signal as IIRC that in itself will result in various signals getting blocked whilst we remain in the signal-handler context.

Thanks.

@@ -1414,6 +1413,11 @@ void PosixSignals::print_signal_handler(outputStream* st, int sig,
sigaction(sig, NULL, &current_act);

print_single_signal_handler(st, &current_act, buf, buflen);

sigset_t thread_sig_mask;
if (::pthread_sigmask(/* ignored */ SIG_BLOCK, NULL, &thread_sig_mask) == 0) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: no need for :: scoping (there is one other existing unnecessary use as well you could remove :) ).

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 19, 2022

@tstuefe This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8293493: Signal Handlers printout should show signal block state

Reviewed-by: dholmes, jsjolen

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 155 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • cd1cdcd: 8293116: Incremental JDK build could be sped up
  • e9401e6: 8293364: IGV: Refactor Action in EditorTopComponent and fix minor bugs
  • 844a95b: 8292892: Javadoc index descriptions are not deterministic
  • 8d1dd6a: 8294076: Improve ant detection in idea.sh
  • 4e7cb15: 8293480: IGV: Update Bytecode and ControlFlow Component immediately when opening a new graph
  • 8ecdaa6: 8294000: Filler array klass should be in jdk/vm/internal, not in java/vm/internal
  • 379f309: 8287217: C2: PhaseCCP: remove not visited nodes, prevent type inconsistency
  • 12e3510: 8293798: Fix test bugs due to incompatibility with -XX:+AlwaysIncrementalInline
  • cb72f80: 8293978: Duplicate simple loop back-edge will crash the vm
  • cddd6de: 8279941: sun/security/pkcs11/Signature/TestDSAKeyLength.java fails when NSS version detection fails
  • ... and 145 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/1ee59adcfead2128316556121c1711d308c7ea01...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 19, 2022
@tstuefe
Copy link
Member Author

tstuefe commented Sep 19, 2022

This seems okay though may be of limited use if the crash is from a signal as IIRC that in itself will result in various signals getting blocked whilst we remain in the signal-handler context.

True, but its interesting to know if we block what we think we block :-)

@jdksjolen
Copy link
Contributor

This LGTM. It fails tier1 tests because it doesn't include the commit that problem lists runtime/os/TestTracePageSizes.java on linux-x64. Merging to master should fix that issue.

@tstuefe
Copy link
Member Author

tstuefe commented Sep 21, 2022

This LGTM. It fails tier1 tests because it doesn't include the commit that problem lists runtime/os/TestTracePageSizes.java on linux-x64. Merging to master should fix that issue.

Thanks @jdksjolen ! Mind hitting the approve button?

@tstuefe
Copy link
Member Author

tstuefe commented Sep 21, 2022

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 21, 2022

Going to push as commit d14e96d.
Since your change was applied there have been 156 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • da4fdfb: 8293659: Improve UnsatisfiedLinkError error message to include dlopen error details
  • cd1cdcd: 8293116: Incremental JDK build could be sped up
  • e9401e6: 8293364: IGV: Refactor Action in EditorTopComponent and fix minor bugs
  • 844a95b: 8292892: Javadoc index descriptions are not deterministic
  • 8d1dd6a: 8294076: Improve ant detection in idea.sh
  • 4e7cb15: 8293480: IGV: Update Bytecode and ControlFlow Component immediately when opening a new graph
  • 8ecdaa6: 8294000: Filler array klass should be in jdk/vm/internal, not in java/vm/internal
  • 379f309: 8287217: C2: PhaseCCP: remove not visited nodes, prevent type inconsistency
  • 12e3510: 8293798: Fix test bugs due to incompatibility with -XX:+AlwaysIncrementalInline
  • cb72f80: 8293978: Duplicate simple loop back-edge will crash the vm
  • ... and 146 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/1ee59adcfead2128316556121c1711d308c7ea01...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 21, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 21, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 21, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 21, 2022

@tstuefe Pushed as commit d14e96d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants