-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JDK-8293493: Signal Handlers printout should show signal block state #10199
JDK-8293493: Signal Handlers printout should show signal block state #10199
Conversation
👋 Welcome back stuefe! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
…ghandler-printout
Friendly ping. Change is really simple. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems okay though may be of limited use if the crash is from a signal as IIRC that in itself will result in various signals getting blocked whilst we remain in the signal-handler context.
Thanks.
@@ -1414,6 +1413,11 @@ void PosixSignals::print_signal_handler(outputStream* st, int sig, | |||
sigaction(sig, NULL, ¤t_act); | |||
|
|||
print_single_signal_handler(st, ¤t_act, buf, buflen); | |||
|
|||
sigset_t thread_sig_mask; | |||
if (::pthread_sigmask(/* ignored */ SIG_BLOCK, NULL, &thread_sig_mask) == 0) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: no need for ::
scoping (there is one other existing unnecessary use as well you could remove :) ).
@tstuefe This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 155 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
True, but its interesting to know if we block what we think we block :-) |
This LGTM. It fails tier1 tests because it doesn't include the commit that problem lists runtime/os/TestTracePageSizes.java on linux-x64. Merging to master should fix that issue. |
Thanks @jdksjolen ! Mind hitting the approve button? |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit d14e96d.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
I needed this recently. We print out the signal block mask, which is fine, but more interesting would be the existing block state at the point of the crash/assertion.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10199/head:pull/10199
$ git checkout pull/10199
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10199
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10199/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10199
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10199
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10199.diff