Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8293813: ProblemList com/sun/jdi/JdbLastErrorTest.java on windows-x64 in Xcomp mode #10288

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor

@kevinjwalls kevinjwalls commented Sep 15, 2022

Add com/sun/jdi/JdbLastErrorTest.java to test/jdk/ProblemList-Xcomp.txt

The test fails immediately with -Xcomp, logged JDK-8293829 to look at that further.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8293813: ProblemList com/sun/jdi/JdbLastErrorTest.java on windows-x64 in Xcomp mode

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10288/head:pull/10288
$ git checkout pull/10288

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10288
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10288/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10288

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10288

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10288.diff

…ion (uncaught)thread=main, TestNativeLastError.testWindows(), line=68 bci=129'
@kevinjwalls kevinjwalls marked this pull request as ready for review September 15, 2022 14:27
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 15, 2022

👋 Welcome back kevinw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 15, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 15, 2022

@kevinjwalls To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels
  • build
  • client
  • compiler
  • core-libs
  • hotspot
  • hotspot-compiler
  • hotspot-gc
  • hotspot-jfr
  • hotspot-runtime
  • i18n
  • ide-support
  • javadoc
  • jdk
  • jmx
  • kulla
  • net
  • nio
  • security
  • serviceability
  • shenandoah

@plummercj
Copy link
Contributor

Usually we file a new issue for problem listing (as a subtask of the main issue). Also, it's not clear to me that JDK-8293813 is now simply a dup of your newly filed JDK-8293829.

@@ -29,3 +29,6 @@

java/lang/invoke/MethodHandles/CatchExceptionTest.java 8146623 generic-all
java/lang/ref/ReferenceEnqueue.java 8284236 generic-all

com/sun/jdi/JdbLastErrorTest.java 8293829 generic-all
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be windows-x64 instead of generic-all?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, updating that. I was thinking it might save some time somewhere to make it generic, but that's probably overthinking.

@dcubed-ojdk
Copy link
Member

I've updated the synopsis for this bug. Please use "/issue JDK-8293813"
to reset the PR's title.

@dcubed-ojdk
Copy link
Member

In the analysis of:
JDK-8293829 Windows native last error value cleared with -Xcomp or -Xint (but not neither)

it mentions that this test can also fail with -Xint. As far as I know, we don't
do any runs with '-Xint' so the ProblemListing for just -Xcomp should be okay.

@kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor Author

/issue JDK-8293813

@kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks Dan for tidying up!

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8293813: com/sun/jdi/JdbLastErrorTest.java failed with 'RuntimeException (uncaught)thread=main, TestNativeLastError.testWindows(), line=68 bci=129' 8293813: ProblemList com/sun/jdi/JdbLastErrorTest.java on windows-x64 in Xcomp mode Sep 15, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 15, 2022

@kevinjwalls This issue is referenced in the PR title - it will now be updated.

@kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor Author

Usually we file a new issue for problem listing (as a subtask of the main issue). Also, it's not clear to me that JDK-8293813 is now simply a dup of your newly filed JDK-8293829.

Thanks Chris - yes after Dan tidying up it might look more as you expect. They are for sure the same issue.

Copy link
Member

@dcubed-ojdk dcubed-ojdk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thumbs up. This is a trivial fix and does not need to wait 24 hours.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 15, 2022

@kevinjwalls This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8293813: ProblemList com/sun/jdi/JdbLastErrorTest.java on windows-x64 in Xcomp mode

Reviewed-by: dcubed

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 18 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 4cec141: 8291509: Minor cleanup could be done in sun.security
  • 6beeb84: 8293875: ProblemList sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/RmiBootstrapTest.java#id1 on linux-x64
  • bf79f99: 8292989: Avoid dynamic memory in AsyncLogWriter
  • 2028ec7: 8289608: Change com/sun/jdi tests to not use Thread.suspend/resume
  • ecb456a: 8293779: redundant checking in AESCrypt.makeSessionKey() method
  • 6fca9ae: 8288474: Move EventContinuationFreezeOld from try_freeze_fast to freeze_slow
  • fbd8b42: 8293591: Remove use of Thread.stop from jshell tests
  • aff5ff1: 8244681: Add a warning for possibly lossy conversion in compound assignments
  • 15cb1fb: 8256265: G1: Improve parallelism in regions that failed evacuation
  • b31a03c: 8293695: Implement isInfinite intrinsic for RISC-V
  • ... and 8 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/211fab8d361822bbd1a34a88626853bf4a029af5...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 15, 2022
@kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 15, 2022

Going to push as commit bb9aa4e.
Since your change was applied there have been 18 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 4cec141: 8291509: Minor cleanup could be done in sun.security
  • 6beeb84: 8293875: ProblemList sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/RmiBootstrapTest.java#id1 on linux-x64
  • bf79f99: 8292989: Avoid dynamic memory in AsyncLogWriter
  • 2028ec7: 8289608: Change com/sun/jdi tests to not use Thread.suspend/resume
  • ecb456a: 8293779: redundant checking in AESCrypt.makeSessionKey() method
  • 6fca9ae: 8288474: Move EventContinuationFreezeOld from try_freeze_fast to freeze_slow
  • fbd8b42: 8293591: Remove use of Thread.stop from jshell tests
  • aff5ff1: 8244681: Add a warning for possibly lossy conversion in compound assignments
  • 15cb1fb: 8256265: G1: Improve parallelism in regions that failed evacuation
  • b31a03c: 8293695: Implement isInfinite intrinsic for RISC-V
  • ... and 8 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/211fab8d361822bbd1a34a88626853bf4a029af5...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 15, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 15, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 15, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 15, 2022

@kevinjwalls Pushed as commit bb9aa4e.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor Author

it mentions that this test can also fail with -Xint. As far as I know, we don't do any runs with '-Xint' so the ProblemListing for just -Xcomp should be okay.

OK great. Regarding -Xint, that seems reliable but can fail after quite a while, like 25mins of continual testing. Even if we did test with -Xint this test is not likely to fail (which I write, of course, to try and provoke a failure).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants