-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8293813: ProblemList com/sun/jdi/JdbLastErrorTest.java on windows-x64 in Xcomp mode #10288
Conversation
…ion (uncaught)thread=main, TestNativeLastError.testWindows(), line=68 bci=129'
👋 Welcome back kevinw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@kevinjwalls To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command. Applicable Labels
|
Usually we file a new issue for problem listing (as a subtask of the main issue). Also, it's not clear to me that JDK-8293813 is now simply a dup of your newly filed JDK-8293829. |
test/jdk/ProblemList-Xcomp.txt
Outdated
@@ -29,3 +29,6 @@ | |||
|
|||
java/lang/invoke/MethodHandles/CatchExceptionTest.java 8146623 generic-all | |||
java/lang/ref/ReferenceEnqueue.java 8284236 generic-all | |||
|
|||
com/sun/jdi/JdbLastErrorTest.java 8293829 generic-all |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be windows-x64 instead of generic-all?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, updating that. I was thinking it might save some time somewhere to make it generic, but that's probably overthinking.
I've updated the synopsis for this bug. Please use "/issue JDK-8293813" |
In the analysis of: it mentions that this test can also fail with -Xint. As far as I know, we don't |
/issue JDK-8293813 |
Thanks Dan for tidying up! |
@kevinjwalls This issue is referenced in the PR title - it will now be updated. |
Thanks Chris - yes after Dan tidying up it might look more as you expect. They are for sure the same issue. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thumbs up. This is a trivial fix and does not need to wait 24 hours.
@kevinjwalls This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 18 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit bb9aa4e.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@kevinjwalls Pushed as commit bb9aa4e. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
OK great. Regarding -Xint, that seems reliable but can fail after quite a while, like 25mins of continual testing. Even if we did test with -Xint this test is not likely to fail (which I write, of course, to try and provoke a failure). |
Add com/sun/jdi/JdbLastErrorTest.java to test/jdk/ProblemList-Xcomp.txt
The test fails immediately with -Xcomp, logged JDK-8293829 to look at that further.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10288/head:pull/10288
$ git checkout pull/10288
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10288
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10288/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10288
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10288
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10288.diff