-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8293886: The abstract keyword can be removed in AESCipher #10297
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back xuelei! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@XueleiFan The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
@XueleiFan This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
ping ... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The change looks fine
@XueleiFan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Two minor nits, but otherwise looks good.
@@ -58,13 +58,14 @@ | |||
* @see OutputFeedback | |||
*/ | |||
|
|||
abstract class AESCipher extends CipherSpi { | |||
class AESCipher extends CipherSpi { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you're doing general cleaning, line 33 import ByteBuffer can go, and there's an extra line in the javadoc at line 53 that could also go.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. I will make the cleanup as well.
/integrate |
Going to push as commit d6468be.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@XueleiFan Pushed as commit d6468be. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi,
Please review this simple fix for readability.
In the AES cipher implementation, the AESCipher class is defined as abstract. As is not necessary as there is no abstract method in this class. Code reader may try to search for abstract methods if the abstract keyword is present.
BTW, I also added Override tags and make a few other cleanup, for example adding the 'final' keywords.
Thanks,
Xuelei
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10297/head:pull/10297
$ git checkout pull/10297
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10297
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10297/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10297
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10297
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10297.diff