Skip to content

8294160: misc crash dump improvements #10387

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

dean-long
Copy link
Member

@dean-long dean-long commented Sep 22, 2022

Try to recover and output meaningful information in more situations, such as:

  • when a pointer is in Method metadata memory range, but the memory is not committed
  • when we call a bad address

When calling a bad address, we usually don't get a meaningful stack backtrace, but in many situations we can if we know where to find the caller information.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10387/head:pull/10387
$ git checkout pull/10387

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10387
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10387/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10387

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10387

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10387.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 22, 2022

👋 Welcome back dlong! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 22, 2022

@dean-long The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Sep 22, 2022
@dean-long dean-long marked this pull request as ready for review September 22, 2022 10:05
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 22, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 22, 2022

Webrevs

@dean-long
Copy link
Member Author

/cc hotspot-runtime
/cc hotspot-compiler

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org label Sep 23, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 23, 2022

@dean-long
The hotspot-runtime label was successfully added.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Sep 23, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 23, 2022

@dean-long
The hotspot-compiler label was successfully added.

Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not familiar with all the aspects of this in enough detail so just a couple of observational comments.

@@ -348,7 +354,7 @@ void os::print_tos_pc(outputStream *st, const void *context) {
// Note: it may be unsafe to inspect memory near pc. For example, pc may
// point to garbage if entry point in an nmethod is corrupted. Leave
// this at the end, and hope for the best.
address pc = os::Posix::ucontext_get_pc(uc);
address pc = os::fetch_frame_from_context(uc).pc();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the difference between ucontext_get_pc(uc) and getting the pc from the frame from the uc? How many pc's can a ucontext have?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The former returns the PC where the crash happened, which could be in unreadable memory. Blindly inspecting that memory will cause error reporting to crash. The latter returns the PC of a frame constructed from the context, and possibly adjusted to reflect where the caller was when it made the bad call, which is more useful for getting stack backtraces and less likely to crash error reporting. When error reporting crashes we recover, but we don't get the information it was dumping when it crashed.

Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay seems quite reasonable. Thanks.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 28, 2022

@dean-long This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8294160: misc crash dump improvements

Reviewed-by: dholmes, vlivanov

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 87 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8873192: 8293515: heapShared.cpp: rename JavaThread parameter to current
  • 76f1865: 8293563: [macos-aarch64] SA core file tests failing with sun.jvm.hotspot.oops.UnknownOopException
  • 9db95ed: 8215788: Clarify JarInputStream Manifest access
  • 9309786: 8294472: Remove redundant rawtypes suppression in AbstractChronology
  • 3b7fc80: 8294411: SA should provide more useful info when it fails to start up due to "failed to workaround classshareing"
  • 4fb424b: 8293961: Unused ClassPathZipEntry::contents_do
  • 7515b30: 8279283: BufferedInputStream should override transferTo
  • 7401fe0: 8292912: Make guard card in CardTable inaccessible
  • 70d8428: 8294520: Problemlist java/nio/file/Files/CopyProcFile.java
  • 30e3bf9: 8291805: IGV: Improve Zooming
  • ... and 77 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/2283c3244f4fe475593d8a53613b5a3228bec356...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 28, 2022
@dean-long
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks David.

Copy link
Contributor

@iwanowww iwanowww left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@dean-long
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks Vladimir.

@dean-long
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 28, 2022

Going to push as commit 6f8f28e.
Since your change was applied there have been 87 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8873192: 8293515: heapShared.cpp: rename JavaThread parameter to current
  • 76f1865: 8293563: [macos-aarch64] SA core file tests failing with sun.jvm.hotspot.oops.UnknownOopException
  • 9db95ed: 8215788: Clarify JarInputStream Manifest access
  • 9309786: 8294472: Remove redundant rawtypes suppression in AbstractChronology
  • 3b7fc80: 8294411: SA should provide more useful info when it fails to start up due to "failed to workaround classshareing"
  • 4fb424b: 8293961: Unused ClassPathZipEntry::contents_do
  • 7515b30: 8279283: BufferedInputStream should override transferTo
  • 7401fe0: 8292912: Make guard card in CardTable inaccessible
  • 70d8428: 8294520: Problemlist java/nio/file/Files/CopyProcFile.java
  • 30e3bf9: 8291805: IGV: Improve Zooming
  • ... and 77 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/2283c3244f4fe475593d8a53613b5a3228bec356...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 28, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 28, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 28, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 28, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 28, 2022

@dean-long Pushed as commit 6f8f28e.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants