Skip to content

8225235: Unused field defaultIndex in NetworkInterface #10471

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

viktorklang-ora
Copy link
Contributor

@viktorklang-ora viktorklang-ora commented Sep 28, 2022

Removes the defaultIndexsince it is no longer used.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8225235: Unused field defaultIndex in NetworkInterface

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10471/head:pull/10471
$ git checkout pull/10471

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10471
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10471/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10471

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10471

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10471.diff

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot added the oca Needs verification of OCA signatory status label Sep 28, 2022
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 28, 2022

Hi @viktorklang-ora, welcome to this OpenJDK project and thanks for contributing!

We do not recognize you as Contributor and need to ensure you have signed the Oracle Contributor Agreement (OCA). If you have not signed the OCA, please follow the instructions. Please fill in your GitHub username in the "Username" field of the application. Once you have signed the OCA, please let us know by writing /signed in a comment in this pull request.

If you already are an OpenJDK Author, Committer or Reviewer, please click here to open a new issue so that we can record that fact. Please use "Add GitHub user viktorklang-ora" as summary for the issue.

If you are contributing this work on behalf of your employer and your employer has signed the OCA, please let us know by writing /covered in a comment in this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 28, 2022

@viktorklang-ora The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • net

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the net net-dev@openjdk.org label Sep 28, 2022
@viktorklang-ora
Copy link
Contributor Author

/covered

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot added the oca-verify Needs verification of OCA signatory status label Sep 28, 2022
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 28, 2022

Thank you! Please allow for a few business days to verify that your employer has signed the OCA. Also, please note that pull requests that are pending an OCA check will not usually be evaluated, so your patience is appreciated!

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot removed oca Needs verification of OCA signatory status oca-verify Needs verification of OCA signatory status labels Sep 28, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 28, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 28, 2022

Webrevs

@jaikiran
Copy link
Member

Hello Viktor, the change looks OK to me. For the NetworkInterface.java file change, could you also update the copyright year from the current 2000, 2021, to 2000, 2022,?

Copy link
Member

@ChrisHegarty ChrisHegarty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 29, 2022

⚠️ @viktorklang-ora the full name on your profile does not match the author name in this pull requests' HEAD commit. If this pull request gets integrated then the author name from this pull requests' HEAD commit will be used for the resulting commit. If you wish to push a new commit with a different author name, then please run the following commands in a local repository of your personal fork:

$ git checkout 8225235
$ git commit --author='Preferred Full Name <you@example.com>' --allow-empty -m 'Update full name'
$ git push

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 29, 2022

@viktorklang-ora This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8225235: Unused field defaultIndex in NetworkInterface

Reviewed-by: chegar, vtewari, dfuchs, jpai

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 65 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • ce85cac: 8065554: MatchResult should provide values of named-capturing groups
  • 1decdce: 8294492: RISC-V: Use li instead of patchable movptr at non-patchable callsites
  • 8491fd5: 8294551: Put java/io/BufferedInputStream/TransferTo.java on problem list
  • 6f8f28e: 8294160: misc crash dump improvements
  • 8873192: 8293515: heapShared.cpp: rename JavaThread parameter to current
  • 76f1865: 8293563: [macos-aarch64] SA core file tests failing with sun.jvm.hotspot.oops.UnknownOopException
  • 9db95ed: 8215788: Clarify JarInputStream Manifest access
  • 9309786: 8294472: Remove redundant rawtypes suppression in AbstractChronology
  • 3b7fc80: 8294411: SA should provide more useful info when it fails to start up due to "failed to workaround classshareing"
  • 4fb424b: 8293961: Unused ClassPathZipEntry::contents_do
  • ... and 55 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/acd75e0f1cddf8307bf0ef4f95a6f11051c30bc2...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@ChrisHegarty, @vyommani, @dfuch, @jaikiran) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 29, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@vyommani vyommani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks OK to me.

Copy link
Member

@dfuch dfuch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please update copyright years in NetworkInterface.java. Otherwise LGTM!

@viktorklang-ora
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dfuch @vyommani @ChrisHegarty Commit added which updates copyright year to 2022 in NetworkInterface.java 👍

@dfuch
Copy link
Member

dfuch commented Sep 29, 2022

Thanks! Please integrate and one of us will sponsor.

@viktorklang-ora
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Sep 29, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 29, 2022

@viktorklang-ora
Your change (at version 3e7a253) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@jaikiran
Copy link
Member

I'll run our internal CI tests to be sure nothing breaks, before sponsoring this.

@jaikiran
Copy link
Member

The relevant tests in tier1, tier2 and tier3 completed without any failures.

@jaikiran
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 30, 2022

Going to push as commit b030c7d.
Since your change was applied there have been 72 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • a07975b: 8294519: (fs) java/nio/file/Files/CopyProcFile.java fails intermittenly due to unstable /proc/cpuinfo output
  • 88062ee: 8293969: breakup the long signature in SystemDictionaryShared::is_supported_invokedynamic
  • aeef3ec: 8294198: Implement isFinite intrinsic for RISC-V
  • 5f6ad92: 8294547: HotSpotAgent.setupVM() should include "cause" exception when throwing DebuggerException
  • 545ded1: 8294548: Problem list SA core file tests on macosx-x64 due to JDK-8294316
  • 29c70f1: 8294595: Add javax/swing/plaf/aqua/CustomComboBoxFocusTest.java to problem list
  • 5d48da4: 8294370: Fix allocation bug in java_lang_Thread::async_get_stack_trace()
  • ce85cac: 8065554: MatchResult should provide values of named-capturing groups
  • 1decdce: 8294492: RISC-V: Use li instead of patchable movptr at non-patchable callsites
  • 8491fd5: 8294551: Put java/io/BufferedInputStream/TransferTo.java on problem list
  • ... and 62 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/acd75e0f1cddf8307bf0ef4f95a6f11051c30bc2...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 30, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 30, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Sep 30, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 30, 2022

@jaikiran @viktorklang-ora Pushed as commit b030c7d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated net net-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants