-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8294514: Wrong initialization of nmethod::_consts_offset for native nmethods #10482
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back rrich! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
vnkozlov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good.
|
@reinrich This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 43 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
Thanks for the reviews @vnkozlov and @dean-long /integrate |
|
Going to push as commit b4e74ae.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Hi,
this small fix copies the initialization of
nmethod::_consts_offsetfrom the nmethod constructor for c1/c2 compiled nmethods to the constructor for native nmethods.Manual testing:
The fix passed our CI testing: most JCK and JTREG test, also in Xcomp mode, SPECjvm2008, SPECjbb2015, Renaissance Suite and SAP specific tests with fastdebug and release builds on the standard platforms plus PPC64.
Thanks, Richard.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10482/head:pull/10482$ git checkout pull/10482Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10482$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10482/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10482View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10482Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10482.diff