-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8252846: Fix ppc/s390 after "8231441: AArch64: Initial SVE backend su… #105
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@GoeLin The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request: When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an RFR email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the |
@@ -62,12 +62,14 @@ const Type::TypeInfo Type::_type_info[Type::lastype] = { | |||
{ Bad, T_ARRAY, "array:", false, Node::NotAMachineReg, relocInfo::none }, // Array | |||
|
|||
#if defined(PPC64) | |||
{ Bad, T_ILLEGAL, "vectora:", false, Op_VecA, relocInfo::none }, // VectorA. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think trailing "." in the comment is unnecessary. Please consider dropping before push.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Aleksey, I would not have put a dot there, but I just copied the line from the #else part which also has the dot.
So I'd rather leave it as-is.
Thanks for reviewing!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right. No biggie, ship it.
{ Bad, T_ILLEGAL, "vectors:", false, 0, relocInfo::none }, // VectorS | ||
{ Bad, T_ILLEGAL, "vectord:", false, Op_RegL, relocInfo::none }, // VectorD | ||
{ Bad, T_ILLEGAL, "vectorx:", false, Op_VecX, relocInfo::none }, // VectorX | ||
{ Bad, T_ILLEGAL, "vectory:", false, 0, relocInfo::none }, // VectorY | ||
{ Bad, T_ILLEGAL, "vectorz:", false, 0, relocInfo::none }, // VectorZ | ||
#elif defined(S390) | ||
{ Bad, T_ILLEGAL, "vectora:", false, Op_VecA, relocInfo::none }, // VectorA. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think trailing "." in the comment is unnecessary. Please consider dropping before push.
@GoeLin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. In addition to the automated checks, the change must also fulfill all project specific requirements After integration, the commit message will be:
Since the source branch of this PR was last updated there has been 1 commit pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid automatic rebasing, please merge ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@@ -62,12 +62,14 @@ const Type::TypeInfo Type::_type_info[Type::lastype] = { | |||
{ Bad, T_ARRAY, "array:", false, Node::NotAMachineReg, relocInfo::none }, // Array | |||
|
|||
#if defined(PPC64) | |||
{ Bad, T_ILLEGAL, "vectora:", false, Op_VecA, relocInfo::none }, // VectorA. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right. No biggie, ship it.
/integrate |
@GoeLin Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit 7ccf435. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
…ache when exporting services. openjdk#105
…ache when exporting services. openjdk#105
…ache when exporting services. openjdk#105 Includes some other minor refactoring.
…ache when exporting services. openjdk#105 Includes some other minor refactoring.
…ache when exporting services. openjdk#105 Includes some other minor refactoring.
…pport"
Hi,
this change fixes the issues after 8231441. The VM crashes right in the build after this change.
The fix is trivial.
Please review.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Download
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/105/head:pull/105
$ git checkout pull/105