Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8290964: C2 compilation fails with assert "non-reduction loop contains reduction nodes" #10535

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

robcasloz
Copy link
Contributor

@robcasloz robcasloz commented Oct 3, 2022

This changeset removes the reduction information consistency assertion in SuperWord::output(), which has proven to report too many false positives (inconsistencies that do not lead to miscompilation) since its introduction by JDK-8279622, despite the efforts to reduce the false positive rate in JDK-8286177. During the time the assertion has been enabled in our internal CI system, no true positive case (reported inconsistencies actually leading to a miscompilation or a crash) has been observed.

An alternative solution would be to wait for JDK-8287087 (work in progress), which proposes a refactoring of the reduction analysis logic that eliminates by construction the need for this assertion. This changeset proposes removing the assertion earlier, to reduce noise in test environments.

Testing

  • hs-tier1 (windows-x64, linux-x64, linux-aarch64, and macosx-x64).

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8290964: C2 compilation fails with assert "non-reduction loop contains reduction nodes"

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10535/head:pull/10535
$ git checkout pull/10535

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10535
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10535/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10535

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10535

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10535.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 3, 2022

👋 Welcome back rcastanedalo! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 3, 2022

@robcasloz The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 3, 2022
@robcasloz robcasloz marked this pull request as ready for review October 3, 2022 14:03
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 3, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 3, 2022

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That looks reasonable to me.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 4, 2022

@robcasloz This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8290964: C2 compilation fails with assert "non-reduction loop contains reduction nodes"

Reviewed-by: thartmann, chagedorn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 14 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 16047e8: 8292780: misc tests failed "assert(false) failed: graph should be schedulable"
  • bf39b18: 8288302: Shenandoah: SIGSEGV in vm maybe related to jit compiling xerces
  • f957ce9: 8294564: IGV: IllegalArgumentException for "Difference to current graph"
  • ae79af2: 8294740: Add cgroups keyword to TestDockerBasic.java
  • 07ed68e: 8288907: serviceability/jvmti/vthread/SuspendResume1/SuspendResume1.java fails with -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=2,3
  • 090cdfc: 8294726: Update URLs in minefield tests
  • ed40d88: 8276849: Refresh the window icon on graphics configuration changes
  • 081691a: 8294593: Check the size of the target on invocations of BigInteger::isProbablePrime
  • a4f2078: 8294437: java/nio/channels/FileChannel tests slow on Windows
  • c6e3daa: 8242115: C2 SATB barriers are not safepoint-safe
  • ... and 4 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/f2a32d996ae09620474771c46a649f6c4e1148ad...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 4, 2022
@robcasloz
Copy link
Contributor Author

That looks reasonable to me.

Thanks, Tobias.

Copy link
Member

@chhagedorn chhagedorn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That makes sense, looks good!

@robcasloz
Copy link
Contributor Author

That makes sense, looks good!

Thanks for reviewing, Christian.

@robcasloz
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 5, 2022

Going to push as commit 4bdd1c9.
Since your change was applied there have been 32 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b4e74ae: 8294514: Wrong initialization of nmethod::_consts_offset for native nmethods
  • 953ce8d: 8293701: jdeps InverseDepsAnalyzer runs into NoSuchElementException: No value present
  • be82cff: 8294748: Cleanup unneeded references to hg
  • 43dbf58: 8186765: Speed up test sun/net/www/protocol/https/HttpsClient/ProxyAuthTest.java
  • 755958e: 8294376: Minimize disabled warnings in java.base
  • 1dafbe3: 8294539: Augment discussion of equivalence relations on floating-point values
  • b2e86a6: 8294255: Add link to DEFAULT_WAIT_TIME in javadoc for SunToolKit.realsSync
  • b22a38d: 8292309: Fix java/awt/PrintJob/ConstrainedPrintingTest/ConstrainedPrintingTest.java test
  • 121d4a5: 8293579: tools/jpackage/share/jdk/jpackage/tests/UnicodeArgsTest.java fails on Japanese Windows platform
  • 1166a8a: 8292214: Memory leak in getAllConfigs of awt_GraphicsEnv.c:386
  • ... and 22 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/f2a32d996ae09620474771c46a649f6c4e1148ad...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 5, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 5, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 5, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 5, 2022

@robcasloz Pushed as commit 4bdd1c9.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants