New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8290964: C2 compilation fails with assert "non-reduction loop contains reduction nodes" #10535
Conversation
|
@robcasloz The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That looks reasonable to me.
@robcasloz This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 14 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.
|
Thanks, Tobias. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That makes sense, looks good!
Thanks for reviewing, Christian. |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 4bdd1c9.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@robcasloz Pushed as commit 4bdd1c9. |
This changeset removes the reduction information consistency assertion in
SuperWord::output()
, which has proven to report too many false positives (inconsistencies that do not lead to miscompilation) since its introduction by JDK-8279622, despite the efforts to reduce the false positive rate in JDK-8286177. During the time the assertion has been enabled in our internal CI system, no true positive case (reported inconsistencies actually leading to a miscompilation or a crash) has been observed.An alternative solution would be to wait for JDK-8287087 (work in progress), which proposes a refactoring of the reduction analysis logic that eliminates by construction the need for this assertion. This changeset proposes removing the assertion earlier, to reduce noise in test environments.
Testing
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10535/head:pull/10535
$ git checkout pull/10535
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10535
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10535/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10535
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10535
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10535.diff