-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8294997: Improve ECC math operations #10614
Conversation
👋 Welcome back djelinski! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@djelinski The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
In src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/provider/DSAParameterGenerator.java there a still some mod(Biginteger.TWO.pow(...)) type subexpressions, e.g. in lines 214, 220, 231, 240 (not that it matters much). |
src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/provider/DSAParameterGenerator.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@@ -329,9 +329,10 @@ private void setLimbsValue(BigInteger v, long[] limbs) { | |||
} | |||
|
|||
protected void setLimbsValuePositive(BigInteger v, long[] limbs) { | |||
BigInteger mod = BigInteger.valueOf(1 << bitsPerLimb); | |||
assert bitsPerLimb < 32; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I may have this assert in the constructors as it is a final field.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added it here as a comment explaining why using intValue is okay here; it wouldn't serve its purpose if I moved it elsewhere.
Asserts are eliminated by the compiler by default anyway. If you think this assert shouldn't be here, I can replace it with a normal comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The assert feature can be turned on. I may prefer to use comment if that's the intention. I'm fine to you want to keep it.
/label -build |
@magicus |
@djelinski This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 96 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 2f60675.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@djelinski Pushed as commit 2f60675. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This patch rewrites some BigInteger and curve point operations used in EC calculations:
t2 = t1+t1
t1 = t1+t2
is equivalent to t1=t1*3, which is now implemented more efficiently.
Benchmarked the code using not-yet-merged benchmark from #10544. Results on x64 before:
After:
Greatest part of the improvement is related to ECOperations changes; BigInteger modifications provide only marginal gains (1584 ops/s without ECOperations changes).
Tier1-3 tests continue to pass.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10614/head:pull/10614
$ git checkout pull/10614
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10614
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10614/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10614
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10614
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10614.diff