Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8289838: ZGC: OOM before clearing all SoftReferences #10646

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

fisk
Copy link
Contributor

@fisk fisk commented Oct 11, 2022

should_clear_soft_references() in mainline ZGC is based purely on the cause of the GC, but the GC cause being used to catch that we need to clear soft references is asynchronous. Another GC could start an instant before it is requested, such as a metadata threshold GC for example. Then the metadata threshold GC will be used instead.

Even if the other async GC that was requested is also of the kind that requires soft references to be cleared, such as a concurrently requested _z_allocation_stall GC, it is possible that the async GC request is performed after a soft reference was created, after a concurrent thread requests a _z_allocation_stall GC, but before that GC has reached mark_start, implying that the sequence number will look like it already got to run an entire GC before throwing, while in fact it did not.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8289838: ZGC: OOM before clearing all SoftReferences

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10646/head:pull/10646
$ git checkout pull/10646

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10646
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10646/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10646

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10646

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10646.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 11, 2022

👋 Welcome back eosterlund! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 11, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 11, 2022

@fisk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 11, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 11, 2022

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 11, 2022

@fisk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8289838: ZGC: OOM before clearing all SoftReferences

Reviewed-by: ayang, tschatzl

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 26 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 11, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@tschatzl tschatzl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 13, 2022

@fisk this pull request can not be integrated into master due to one or more merge conflicts. To resolve these merge conflicts and update this pull request you can run the following commands in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout 8289838_soft_ref_trouble
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# resolve conflicts and follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push

@openjdk openjdk bot added merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 13, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review and removed merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch labels Nov 2, 2022
@fisk
Copy link
Contributor Author

fisk commented Nov 2, 2022

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 2, 2022

Going to push as commit 491d43c.
Since your change was applied there have been 29 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 2, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 2, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 2, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 2, 2022

@fisk Pushed as commit 491d43c.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@fisk
Copy link
Contributor Author

fisk commented Nov 2, 2022

Thanks for the reviews!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants