Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8295124: Atomic::add to pointer type may return wrong value #10667

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

kimbarrett
Copy link

@kimbarrett kimbarrett commented Oct 12, 2022

Please review this change to the handling of Atomic pointer arithmetic. When
the value being modified is a pointer P*, the type of the value in the
destination passed to the platform operation is const char*, so a pointer
type whose pointee is size 1. This allows the platform operation to just treat
the arithmetic as a simple byte adjustment.

To demonstrate the problem described in the bug (possible incorrect result for
Atomic pointer arithmetic) and show that it is now fixed, this change also
includes some gtests for Atomic operations, including pointer arithmetic which
fails before the change and succeeds after.

Testing: mach5 tier1-3


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8295124: Atomic::add to pointer type may return wrong value

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10667/head:pull/10667
$ git checkout pull/10667

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10667
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10667/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10667

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10667

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10667.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 12, 2022

👋 Welcome back kbarrett! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 12, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 12, 2022

@kimbarrett The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 12, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 12, 2022

Webrevs

@kimbarrett
Copy link
Author

Poke - any takers.

Copy link
Contributor

@tschatzl tschatzl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 19, 2022

@kimbarrett This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8295124: Atomic::add to pointer type may return wrong value

Reviewed-by: tschatzl, coleenp

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 19, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@coleenp coleenp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I get it! Looks good.

@kimbarrett
Copy link
Author

Thanks @tschatzl and @coleenp for reviews.

@kimbarrett
Copy link
Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 20, 2022

Going to push as commit 1164258.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 20, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 20, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 20, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 20, 2022

@kimbarrett Pushed as commit 1164258.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@kimbarrett kimbarrett deleted the test-atomic branch October 21, 2022 03:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants