JDK-8293681 ResponseAPDU getData() method javadoc

[mcpowers]

https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8293681

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8293681: ResponseAPDU getData() method javadoc

Reviewers

• Valerie Peng (@valeriepeng - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10732/head:pull/10732
$ git checkout pull/10732

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10732
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10732/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10732

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10732

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10732.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back mpowers! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@mcpowers The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• security

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (40bec856)

[valeriepeng]

Looks good. Thanks~

[openjdk]

@mcpowers This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8293681: ResponseAPDU getData() method javadoc

Reviewed-by: valeriep

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 137 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 8d4c077: 8295302: Do not use ArrayList when LambdaForm has a single ClassData
• 017e798: 8293939: Move continuation_enter_setup and friends
• f872467: 8255746: Make PrintCompilation available on a per method level
• 388a56e: 8294467: Fix sequence-point warnings in Hotspot
• ceb5b08: 8294468: Fix char-subscripts warnings in Hotspot
• 7b1c676: 8295662: jdk/incubator/vector tests fail "assert(VM_Version::supports_avx512vlbw()) failed"
• 5eaf568: 8295668: validate-source failure after JDK-8290011
• e238920: 8295372: CompactNumberFormat handling of number one with decimal part
• a5f6e31: 8295456: (ch) sun.nio.ch.Util::checkBufferPositionAligned gives misleading/incorrect error
• e27bea0: 8290011: IGV: Remove dead code and cleanup
• ... and 127 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/07946aa49c97c93bd11675a9b0b90d07c83f2a94...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@valeriepeng) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[mcpowers]

@valeriepeng thanks for the review!

[mcpowers]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@mcpowers
Your change (at version 40bec85) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[wangweij]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit e269dc0.
Since your change was applied there have been 413 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 8c472e4: 8294217: Assertion failure: parsing found no loops but there are some
• 0fe2bf5: 8296805: ctw build is broken
• e1d298c: 8296741: Illegal X400Address and EDIPartyName should not be created
• b0edfc1: 8164464: Consistent failure of java/awt/dnd/MissingEventsOnModalDialog/MissingEventsOnModalDialogTest.java
• 9c39932: 8294899: Process.waitFor() throws IllegalThreadStateException when a process on Windows returns an exit code of 259
• 3f401b3: 8296670: G1: Remove unused G1GCPhaseTimes::record_preserve_cm_referents_time_ms
• 68301cd: 8296665: IGV: Show dialog with stack trace for exceptions
• 277f0c2: 8296821: compiler/jvmci/jdk.vm.ci.code.test/src/jdk/vm/ci/code/test/NativeCallTest.java fails after JDK-8262901
• 34d10f1: 8296243: [IR Framework] Fix issues with IRNode.ALLOC* regexes
• 8eb90e2: 8296797: java/nio/channels/vthread/BlockingChannelOps.testSocketChannelWriteAsyncClose failed with ClosedChannelException
• ... and 403 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/07946aa49c97c93bd11675a9b0b90d07c83f2a94...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@wangweij @mcpowers Pushed as commit e269dc0.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.