8296611: Problemlist several sun/security tests until JDK-8295343 is resolved

[mseledts]

Trivial change, updated jdk problem list.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8296611: Problemlist several sun/security tests until JDK-8295343 is resolved

Reviewers

• Rajan Halade (@rhalade - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11045/head:pull/11045
$ git checkout pull/11045

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/11045
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11045/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 11045

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 11045

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11045.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back mseledtsov! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@mseledts To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels

• build
• client
• compiler
• core-libs
• hotspot
• hotspot-compiler
• hotspot-gc
• hotspot-jfr
• hotspot-runtime
• i18n
• ide-support
• javadoc
• jdk
• jmx
• kulla
• net
• nio
• security
• serviceability
• shenandoah

[mseledts]

@dcubed-ojdk Dan, could you please review this problem listing change ?

[mseledts]

/label security

[openjdk]

@mseledts
The security label was successfully added.

[mseledts]

/label add security

[mseledts]

/label add core-libs

[openjdk]

@mseledts The security label was already applied.

[openjdk]

@mseledts
The core-libs label was successfully added.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 01: Full - Incremental (54faacf5)
• 00: Full (8834f40e)

[seanjmullan]

The java/security/cert/pkix/policyChanges/TestPolicy.java and java/security/cert/CertPathBuilder/targetConstraints/BuildEEBasicConstraints.java test failures are already fixed. There is no need to ProblemList them.

[mseledts]

Thanks Sean. I will remove the fixed tests from the list.

[mseledts]

I have updated the problem list to exclude fixed tests. Please review when you have a chance.

[rhalade]

Please update the PR commit message in summary. I updated JBS bug summary to indicate only sun/security tests failed.

[openjdk]

@mseledts This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8296611: Problemlist several sun/security tests until JDK-8295343 is resolved

Reviewed-by: rhalade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 16 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 102b2b3: 8292033: Move jdk.X509Certificate event logic to JCA layer
• 1b94ae1: 8296139: Make GrowableBitMap the base class of all implementations
• cc8bf95: 8296718: Refactor bootstrap Test Common Functionalities to test/lib/Utils
• 17e3412: 8296615: use of undeclared identifier 'IPV6_DONTFRAG'
• a5d838c: 8296591: Signature benchmark
• fa8a866: 8296675: Exclude linux-aarch64 in NSS tests
• d4376f8: 8296406: ChainingConstructors jtreg test reduce code duplication
• 4a0093c: 8294362: UL: Replace the internal usage of manual buffers with stringStream in LogSelection
• fef68bb: 8296515: RISC-V: Small refactoring for MaxReductionV/MinReductionV/AddReductionV node implementation
• 82cbfb5: 8296140: Drop unused field java.util.Calendar.DATE_MASK
• ... and 6 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/0ee25de704eb8f179888812bd9b1e7bebc384fd6...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[mseledts]

Thank you Rajan.

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit d6e2d0d.
Since your change was applied there have been 16 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 102b2b3: 8292033: Move jdk.X509Certificate event logic to JCA layer
• 1b94ae1: 8296139: Make GrowableBitMap the base class of all implementations
• cc8bf95: 8296718: Refactor bootstrap Test Common Functionalities to test/lib/Utils
• 17e3412: 8296615: use of undeclared identifier 'IPV6_DONTFRAG'
• a5d838c: 8296591: Signature benchmark
• fa8a866: 8296675: Exclude linux-aarch64 in NSS tests
• d4376f8: 8296406: ChainingConstructors jtreg test reduce code duplication
• 4a0093c: 8294362: UL: Replace the internal usage of manual buffers with stringStream in LogSelection
• fef68bb: 8296515: RISC-V: Small refactoring for MaxReductionV/MinReductionV/AddReductionV node implementation
• 82cbfb5: 8296140: Drop unused field java.util.Calendar.DATE_MASK
• ... and 6 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/0ee25de704eb8f179888812bd9b1e7bebc384fd6...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@mseledts Pushed as commit d6e2d0d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.