New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8296602: RISC-V: improve performance of copy_memory stub #11058
Conversation
|
@VladimirKempik The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
linux -x86 failure is infra issue and unrelated. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice numbers! Overall looks good to me. Several minor nits.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated change looks good. Thanks.
PS: I think it might be better to rename 'copy8' and 'copy32' into 'copy8_loop' and 'copy32_loop' respectively. But it's up to you.
@VladimirKempik This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 128 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.
|
/integrate |
Going to push as commit bd57e21.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@VladimirKempik Pushed as commit bd57e21. |
Please review this change to improve the performance of copy_memory stub on risc-v
This change has three parts
testing: org.openjdk.bench.vm.compiler.ArrayCopyObject, hotspot_compiler_arraycopy, hotspot:tier1, hotspot:tier2 - all ok
hotspot:tier2 is on the way.
and for the benchmark results, using
org.openjdk.bench.vm.compiler.ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro
thead rvb-ice c910
thead
Before ( copy8 only )
Benchmark (size) Mode Cnt Score Error Units
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 31 thrpt 25 6653.095 ± 251.565 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 63 thrpt 25 4933.970 ± 77.559 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 127 thrpt 25 3627.454 ± 34.589 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 2047 thrpt 25 368.249 ± 0.453 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 4095 thrpt 25 187.776 ± 0.306 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 8191 thrpt 25 94.477 ± 0.340 ops/ms
after ( with copy32 )
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 31 thrpt 25 7620.546 ± 69.756 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 63 thrpt 25 6677.978 ± 33.112 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 127 thrpt 25 5206.973 ± 22.612 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 2047 thrpt 25 653.655 ± 31.494 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 4095 thrpt 25 352.905 ± 7.390 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 8191 thrpt 25 165.127 ± 0.832 ops/ms
after ( copy32 with dead code elimination and independent addis )
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 31 thrpt 25 7576.346 ? 94.487 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 63 thrpt 25 6475.730 ? 252.590 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 127 thrpt 25 5221.764 ? 20.415 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 2047 thrpt 25 691.847 ? 1.102 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 4095 thrpt 25 360.269 ? 1.091 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 8191 thrpt 25 179.733 ? 3.012 ops/ms
on hifive unmatched:
before:
Benchmark (size) Mode Cnt Score Error Units
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 31 thrpt 25 5391.575 ± 152.984 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 63 thrpt 25 3700.946 ± 43.175 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 127 thrpt 25 2316.160 ± 24.734 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 2047 thrpt 25 188.616 ± 0.151 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 4095 thrpt 25 95.323 ± 0.053 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 8191 thrpt 25 46.935 ± 0.041 ops/ms
after:
Benchmark (size) Mode Cnt Score Error Units
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 31 thrpt 25 6136.169 ± 330.409 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 63 thrpt 25 4924.020 ± 78.529 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 127 thrpt 25 3732.561 ± 89.606 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 2047 thrpt 25 431.103 ± 0.505 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 4095 thrpt 25 221.543 ± 0.363 ops/ms
ArrayCopyObject.conjoint_micro 8191 thrpt 25 100.586 ± 0.197 ops/ms
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11058/head:pull/11058
$ git checkout pull/11058
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/11058
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11058/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 11058
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 11058
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11058.diff