-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8296771: RISC-V: C2: assert(false) failed: bad AD file #11085
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8296771: RISC-V: C2: assert(false) failed: bad AD file #11085
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back xlinzheng! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@zhengxiaolinX The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
shipilev
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks fine to me. I do wonder if there are similar lurking bugs with other iRegP_* that should probably also be part of operand iRegP; this limited fix is okay, though, as riscv.ad only has iRegP_R15 and iRegP_R10 as result registers in existing match rules.
|
@zhengxiaolinX This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 13 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@shipilev, @RealFYang) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
Yes, it seems to me as well that only |
|
Tier1 says okay. Thanks for reviewing! /integrate |
|
@zhengxiaolinX |
|
/sponsor |
|
Going to push as commit 7244eac.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@RealFYang @zhengxiaolinX Pushed as commit 7244eac. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
|
/backport port-riscv-jdk11u |
|
@kuaiwei To use the |
The backend encounters the same assertion failure as JDK-8295414. This patch is a similar fix.
Same,
partialSubtypeCheckusesiRegP_R15as a result while its useiRegPdoesn't match theiRegP_R15, causing this failure.The details are in the JBS issue JDK-8296771.
Tested the failed
compiler/types/TestSubTypeCheckMacroTrichotomy.java, and a hotspot tier1 is running now.Thanks,
Xiaolin
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11085/head:pull/11085$ git checkout pull/11085Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/11085$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11085/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 11085View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 11085Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11085.diff